Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 16:39:34 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Tuesday 09 Oct 2012 13:10:43 guido wrote:
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 10:33:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Well each one lasts less than a seconf and they are happening much less than
once per second. So no, that's not a lot.
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 16:39:34 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Tuesday 09 Oct 2012 13:10:43 guido wrote:
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 10:33:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Well each one lasts less than a seconf and they are happening much less than
once per second. So no, that's not a lot.
On Monday 08 Oct 2012 22:06:59 guido wrote:
Nothing obvious there. Are you sure it was using heavy CPU at the time?
It's always using this much CPU, including at that time. I checked. (With top)
If so it might be a garbage collection issue
how much memory is Freenet allowed in
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 10:33:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Monday 08 Oct 2012 22:06:59 guido wrote:
Nothing obvious there. Are you sure it was using heavy CPU at the time?
It's always using this much CPU, including at that time. I checked. (With
top)
If so it might be a
On Tuesday 09 Oct 2012 13:10:43 guido wrote:
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 10:33:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Monday 08 Oct 2012 22:06:59 guido wrote:
Nothing obvious there. Are you sure it was using heavy CPU at the time?
It's always using this much CPU, including at that time. I
On Monday 08 October 2012 12:04:54 you wrote:
On Sunday 07 Oct 2012 23:01:34 you wrote:
On Friday 05 October 2012 10:34:45 you wrote:
On Thursday 04 Oct 2012 20:35:41 guido wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2012, 16:07:25 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
How much CPU is Freenet using just
On Saturday 29 Sep 2012 22:59:19 guido wrote:
Hi,
I have been letting my Freenet node just run in the background without paying
any attention to it for maybe the last 12 months or so. Lately, I've had
another look at it and the wrapper log file, and it appears it hasn't been
running
