Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >!!! Unable to decode the following MIME section !!! >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg" >Content-Disposition: inline > > >--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Disposition: inline >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ? > >That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly >not before 1.0. > >0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer >updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g. >simulations. > >Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every >few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. Ok, I should rephrase "until 0.7's stability equals or exceeds that of 0.5 *and* open-net is activated" >On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: >>=20 >> I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable >> enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is >> activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5 >--=20 >Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ >ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > >--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg >Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" >Content-Description: Digital signature >Content-Disposition: inline > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQFEy4ygOHFIJVywduQRAk5mAKCKvmAG7uJMyLy5nBFc8LFXH9I8SwCfWHRu >E4+zIwH4Bzwg9qp34vun8xU= >=J7A9 >-END PGP SIGNATURE- > >--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg-- > >___ >Support mailing list >Support@freenetproject.org >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
"Stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year" ? That will never happen, not if I have anything to do with it, certainly not before 1.0. 0.5 had loads of updates. Granted there were periods when it had fewer updates because people were concentrating on other things e.g. simulations. Now, should we try to only put out one new build number a week, or every few days? Probably, but only after 0.7 has entered the beta phase. On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:54:31AM -, Anonymous Freenet User wrote: > > I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable > enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is > activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5 -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Why is the main Download Freenet 0.7 when it's
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Scruple Scruple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why is alpha software Freenet 0.7 being pushed onto users on the >download page? I think it better that the stable Freenet 0.5 be featured >as the preferred download. > > http://freenet.sourceforge.net/download.html > > Until Freenet 0.7 has open-net I do not think it is ready to be treated >in favor of 0.5. New users are not sticking around on 0.7 because there >are few content, finding peers harder with darknet along other problems, >bugs and continual updates. > >Pushing 0.7 onto new users in spite of it lack of maturity is in poor form. > P.S. On a related topic of reports & complains about a lack of content >on Freenet 0.7, I may have an explanation for that. I am in touch with a >number of major Freenet (0.5) content providers since I run the largest >media & content index site on Freenet 0.5 (FreeNova). Many users, >including my self, are staying with 0.5 until 0.7 proves itself. > > Scruple > I agree. I am willing to experiment with 0.7, but until it is stable enough that updates only come a couple of times a year and open-net is activated, I will be keeping my main content on 0.5 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
