Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-15 Thread Paul Mansfield
Christopher Iarocci wrote: > I'd love to use OpenVPN, but the end users have to set it up themselves, and what I've done is to have one config file with all the common stuff at the top and a section at the bottom with individual people's config (just two lines for their key/cert) commented out, s

Re: [pfSense Support] Multi-WAN PPTP?

2009-01-15 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:00:21PM -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: > You can build an installer file that has no prompts for the user to > click and auto installs the config - double click the installer, wait > a bit, and you're done. pfSense 2.0 has the capability to create such I'm really looking

[pfSense Support] hard disk partition suggestions

2009-01-15 Thread Frédéric Boiteux
Hello, I'd like to run pfSense on an Alix board (2c3) with an external USB 2'5 drive, to have access to packages (bandwidthd ...). I've done a setup which is working (booting from a CF, then mounting USB disk drive, as Alix card can't boot on USB), but I have a problem with partition la

Re: [pfSense Support] Intel Atom Motherboards or Similar Systems

2009-01-15 Thread Angelo Turetta
Chuck Mariotti wrote: Thanks for the info... I will stay away from Jetway. Are there any limitations to what these ALIX boards can do or handle in terms of traffic? I'd like to do some load balancing, run SMTP spam filter and IDS on it. I have no need for wireless. Which board do you recommend

Re: [pfSense Support] Intel Atom Motherboards or Similar Systems

2009-01-15 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Angelo Turetta wrote: > Never try to route/bridge between high speed LAN segments, though. > Maximum sustainable throughput around 20 Mbps (with polling), but copying a > 30GB backup file from one net to another is not recommended: on FreeBSD6 > based pfSense I fre

Re: [pfSense Support] Intel Atom Motherboards or Similar Systems

2009-01-15 Thread Larry Sampas
I ran the openssl speed tests on my Alix.2d3 w/hardware acceleration and on my Atom box for fun. Alix is running pfSense embedded, Atom is running Asterisk on CentOS 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5. These are not network tests but rather speed of encryption tests. Atom Board: The 'numbers' are in 1000s of byte

[pfSense Support] Bandwidth problems/collisions/packet loss

2009-01-15 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Hi, I'm trying to troubleshoot a problem on a PfSense 1.2-RELEASE, running on a P4 1.4, Hard-drive install, 1 GB RAM. WAN is vr0 and Lan (vlan0, vlan1 and vlan2) is on fxp0. WAN is auto-sense, and ends up 100baseTX (half-duplex, I guess) and fxp0 is 100basetx . vr0 is connected directly in

[pfSense Support] Re: Bandwidth problems/collisions/packet loss

2009-01-15 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Ugo Bellavance wrote: Hi, I'm trying to troubleshoot a problem on a PfSense 1.2-RELEASE, running on a P4 1.4, Hard-drive install, 1 GB RAM. WAN is vr0 and Lan (vlan0, vlan1 and vlan2) is on fxp0. WAN is auto-sense, and ends up 100baseTX (half-duplex, I guess) and fxp0 is 100basetx . vr

Re: [pfSense Support] Bandwidth problems/collisions/packet loss

2009-01-15 Thread Curtis LaMasters
I've seen this a few times on Cisco switches; telnet to the switch and look at the interface that is connected to the pfSense box (show int fastethernet 0/#) and see if it is running at full or half duplex. If it's half, then manually set the interface to full duplex with the following commands...

[pfSense Support] Re: Bandwidth problems/collisions/packet loss

2009-01-15 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Curtis LaMasters wrote: I've seen this a few times on Cisco switches; telnet to the switch and look at the interface that is connected to the pfSense box (show int fastethernet 0/#) and see if it is running at full or half duplex. If it's half, then manually set the interface to full duplex wi