Re: [Sursound] Exciting news anyone?

2011-04-02 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Svein Berge wrote: Fons has previously asked for a jack-enabled stand-alone application instead. No, I have not. I asked *if* it would output via Jack. Or if it would work with the 24..64 ch cards I use. Your answer amounts to I don't really know,

[Sursound] Dynamic range, anyone?

2011-04-02 Thread Hugh Pyle
... but for those of you who like loud noises: enjoy! http://halfbricking.com/Samples/Howitzer/ Hugh -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110402/511ae9aa/attachment.html

Re: [Sursound] Exciting news anyone?

2011-04-02 Thread Marc Lavallée
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 12:38:50 +0200, Svein Berge sve...@pvv.org wrote : My personalized demo works in Linux with jackd when using the dssi-vst host. And it works very well. Congrats! I tried to compile vst/wine support into ardour, but after a couple of hours of messing about, gave up on it

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 33, Issue 2

2011-04-02 Thread David Prior
Hi Svein, This will be a great contribution I think and I'm impressed by the sound of the stand-alone player on recordings made with my SPS200/ ULN8. For now though, I can't make it work in Reaper (OSX), which is the only DAW environment I've worked in so far other than Nuendo, that

Re: [Sursound] Exciting news anyone?

2011-04-02 Thread Svein Berge
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110402/d6b53d7e/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu

Re: [Sursound] Harpex-B and Reaper

2011-04-02 Thread John Leonard
That would be a no, then. Here's a link: https://www.me.com/gallery/#100217 Regards, John On 2 Apr 2011, at 16:44, John Leonard wrote: Are we allowed screen-shots on this list? ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu

Re: [Sursound] Harpex-B and Reaper

2011-04-02 Thread John Leonard
Which seems to take you to the main gallery: Please ignore all the personal stuff and see the harpex-b picture. Sigh! Regards, John On 2 Apr 2011, at 16:48, John Leonard wrote: That would be a no, then. Here's a link: https://www.me.com/gallery/#100217 Regards, John On 2 Apr

Re: [Sursound] Harpex-B and Reaper

2011-04-02 Thread Paul Hodges
attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screen shot 2011-04-02 at 16.37.41.jpg Type: image/jpg Size: 261178 bytes Desc: not available URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110402/ 224f682e/attachment.jpg -- next part -- That link required my sursound

Re: [Sursound] Exciting news anyone?

2011-04-02 Thread Marc Lavallée
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 22:40:07 +0200, Svein Berge sve...@pvv.org wrote : You are using the Juce framework for your C++ development, which is a free software, you know how valuable it is. I have a commercial license for juce. It was not free. It was free until you decided to release a

Re: [Sursound] Harpex-B and Reaper

2011-04-02 Thread John Leonard
I know - ignore it and do what Paul did - believe me, it'll be easier. John (Suffering from late nights, jet-lag and hideous RF breakthrough in Manhattan.) On 2 Apr 2011, at 17:05, Fons Adriaensen wrote: Which first complains about my browser (firefox 4.0), allows me go on anyway, but then

[Sursound] Trying again - Reaper/Harpex-B Image

2011-04-02 Thread John Leonard
Try this: http://s206.photobucket.com/albums/bb211/soundmanjohn/?action=viewcurrent=Screenshot2011-04-02at163741.jpg Regards, John ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound