On 09/15/2011 09:03 PM, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Quite - I would have said this is absolutely standard operational
procedure - my best guess is that the patent examiner was actually an
expert in hieroglyphics or ancient Summarian writings and so he'd never
been near a recording studio or a
Quite - I would have said this is absolutely standard operational procedure
- my best guess is that the patent examiner was actually an expert in
hieroglyphics or ancient Summarian writings and so he'd never been near a
recording studio or a composer of computer music - or Ville Pulki or...
Well, now you're in trouble...
> Seems like I violated that one *today*. For a 'tape' concert in a few
> weeks I was asked to modify some stereo recordings just to give them
> a more 'spatial' feel when reproduced in surround, and without adding
> reverb or room reflections. So I took 8 BP filter
Dear all
This is a super interesting post opening here...
Below is the call and the description. Do not hesitate to contact Monty or me
for further details.
pa
--
Those of you who know our department (from the ICMC etc.) will know that we
have a very strong composition team and an equally
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:25:36PM +0100, dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
> It seems you can get a patent for anything, even if totally obvious and
> common practise.. - check out EP1558061A2
Seems like I violated that one *today*. For a 'tape' concert in a few
weeks I was asked to modify some st
It seems you can get a patent for anything, even if totally obvious and
common practise.. - check out EP1558061A2
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
