If lacking a anechoic chamber, substitute it with:
1 - A large field covered with about half a meter of newfallen snow.
2 - On the top ridge of a gabled barn standing in a field.
3 - In the top of a large free standing tree.
Some effort and dedication is needed to replace the cash expenditure
Hi Fons
On 30/05/2012 18:24, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Augustine Leudar wrote:
but anyone listening carefully would have heard a fly about 1 foot high !
This magnification effect has been reported many times.
I wonder how much it has to do with playing
On 31/05/2012 01:27, etienne deleflie wrote:
..
perception. I wonder if perhaps direction is *not* that important to
spatial audio. Ofcourse, it is a part, but is it central? This view leads
to the questioning of the value of higher order ambisonics.
I don't think people are actually allowed
On 30/05/2012 21:49, Eric Carmichel wrote:
So how good is Ambisonics in reproducing the original auditory 'scene'? If the
reconstructed wavefield is close to the original, then what happens when you
record the Ambisonics system itself? Will the playback of this recording yield
the same
Interestingly, he dinosaur size geese (John Leonard's recording when geese go
bad) was played in a field, speaker radius 15-20 metres. And the passing
motorbike was impressively large, too.
AS a rule of thumb, I've always found that one needs to bear in mind the
speaker array radius when
Dave said:
Here, to any extent, I depart from Gibson. With sufficiently advanced
technology there comes a point at which the effort required to suspend
disbelief is so small as to be negligible. I was reading a report on a paper a
few months ago (I think in New Scientist) where the authors
On 31 May 2012 12:52, Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk wrote:
Actually, there is something here, though I do wonder if it is pathological.
I've met people who told me that such-and-such a driving game was
fantastically realistic. I found it stilted, leaden and profoundly
unrealistic. I've
Hi Dave,
This magnification effect has been reported many times.
I wonder how much it has to do with playing back at too high
levels. We do associate LF energy and size. Too much of it
and the source 'must be' big.
That's certainly important - kind of the other end of the scale of quite
Hi Fons
On 31/05/2012 14:42, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
I did a small experiment a few weeks ago, and was quite surprised by the result. In a concert we
did at the CdS there were three pieces for solo flute and 'tape'. We got the 'tapes' as CDs of
course. The artistic director of the festival
in order to notice there was something strange with the sound it
produced.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120531/82abef66/attachment.html
, I greatly appreciate everyone’s help and insight!
Best always,
Eric
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120531/1d947194/attachment.html
11 matches
Mail list logo
