Re: [Sursound] 256 channel out system - recommendations ?

2012-12-10 Thread Sebastian Gabler
Am 09.12.2012 13:00, schrieb Fons Adriaensen: Apart from that, syncing cards requires more than just a common clock, you also need a single 'start' signal distributed in HW ('start' meaning that the next sample will be at position 0 in the first buffer). If the start signal is just distributed

Re: [Sursound] 256 channel out system - recommendations ?

2012-12-10 Thread Charlie Richmond
is via skype -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20121210/e5eb93fd/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https

Re: [Sursound] remarks on with-height wfs

2012-12-10 Thread Peter Lennox
WFS does give an opportunity (in ideal circumstances, I think) to have imagery inside the array, holographic style. Not everywhere in the array, and although it is remarkably robust (the image stays in one place, a point hovering in mid-air) as the perceiver moves around, it does 'break' if

[Sursound] So, the SPS200 is inverting after all...

2012-12-10 Thread Daniel Courville
I thought that, since the SPS200 was not going through a SoundField controller box, the mic signal would not be inverting, like what we have with the B-Format output on vintage SF mics or even more recent models like the ST350. Well, the SPS 200 is inverting after all...