[Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread John Leonard
Checking out the DeWolfe library music site this morning and saw a couple of new releases called Ambisonics 1 2. Got quite excited until I checked and found that these are just stereo tracks with a fancy name: basically just a conflation of Ambient Sonics. I can't remember - does anyone

Re: [Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread Espen Braathen
The ambisonics trademark was registered in the US by Nimbus Records, but was abandoned i 1992 and have thus been dead for the last 20 years. The ambisonic trademark was registered and abandoned in 2009 by an individual. Espen From: John Leonard [j...@johnleonard.co.uk] Sent: 2013-12-04

Re: [Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread Peter Lennox
How much does it cost to secure either or both? - is there an ongoing overhead? Dr. Peter Lennox School of Technology, Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology University of Derby, UK e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk t: 01332 593155 -Original Message- From: Sursound

Re: [Sursound] VR and cheap headtracking in 2013...

2013-12-04 Thread Matthias Kronlachner
Hi! On 12/2/13 10:33 PM, Julian Rabius wrote: Matthias, your plugins will be very appreciated. Are the IEM-Cube and Mumuth impulse responses available? They should have been released since the LAC 2013, you can ask the authors about that: http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2013/papers/60.pdf These

Re: [Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread Michael Chapman
How much does it cost to secure either or both? - is there an ongoing overhead? Dr. Peter Lennox I would say ambisonics is a 'dictionary word' (though I haven't looked in any dictionaries). Whatever, it has been in use a long time and unprotected. The withdrawal of the US application was

Re: [Sursound] VR and cheap headtracking in 2013...

2013-12-04 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:24:05PM +0200, Matthias Kronlachner wrote: Are the IEM-Cube and Mumuth impulse responses available? They should have been released since the LAC 2013, you can ask the authors about that: http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2013/papers/60.pdf These BRIRs will be included in

Re: [Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread David Pickett
At 12:31 04-12-13, Michael Chapman wrote: I would say ambisonics is a 'dictionary word' (though I haven't looked in any dictionaries). Whatever, it has been in use a long time and unprotected. It doesnt hurt to ask, since it can be shown that the word has had specific useage for a long time.

Re: [Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread Michael Chapman
At 12:31 04-12-13, Michael Chapman wrote: I would say ambisonics is a 'dictionary word' (though I haven't looked in any dictionaries). Whatever, it has been in use a long time and unprotected. It doesnt hurt to ask, since it can be shown that the word has had specific useage for a

Re: [Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread John Abram
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131204/4973bd74/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] DeWolfe Library Music - Ambisonics confusion

2013-12-04 Thread Geoffrey Barton
any word and, just like a patent, it stays valid until somebody successfully contests it, if it is allowed to start with. Geoffrey -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131204/a69cb29b