Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

eldri...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > To add on top of the previous email, there are three then ( I didn t know > > about COMPASS), because Harpex can be a vst itself, which sounds > > magnificently good. > > > > Regards > > Axel > > -- next part --

[Sursound] Sounds in Space 2019

-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190222/58a3a547/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscrib

[Sursound] FOA resolution

Hi all, At some point I recall reading somewhere that with a FOA recording transformed into binaural sound, a listener is only able to work out the direction of a point source sound to about 15 degrees accuracy in the horizontal plane, compared to being able to identify it to around 2 or 3

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

ew archives and so on. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190222/490b829d/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://m

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

Hi David, These upmixing methods extract a lot of information from the FOA recording that is then re-used to essentially “synthesize" the HOA signals, with a spatial resolution that would not be possible with the FOA recordings. They are “active” in that sense, and signal-dependent, compared

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

At 02:37 22-02-19, Wilson Lim wrote: ot sure if I have missed a discussion about upmixing with ambisonics on Sursound. Just wondering if anyone is willing to share some information on how to implement upmixing algorithms from 1st Order Ambisonics A to 3rd Order Ambisonics B-format. I am

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

ch sounds > magnificently good. > > Regards > Axel > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190222/062f6801/attachment.html> > ___

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

about COMPASS), because Harpex can be a vst itself, which sounds magnificently good. Regards Axel -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

l, there are three then ( I didn t know about COMPASS), because Harpex can be a vst itself, which sounds magnificently good. Regards Axel -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190222/062

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

; https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190222/c16a21c1/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu<mailto:Sursound@music.vt.edu> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe he

Re: [Sursound] Enquiry on upmixing from 1st order ambisonics to 3rd order ambisonics.

> > Much Obliged, > Wilson Lim > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190222/c16a21c1/attachment.html > > > ___ > Su