Am 09.12.2012 13:00, schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
Apart from that, syncing cards requires more than just a common
clock, you also need a single 'start' signal distributed in HW
('start' meaning that the next sample will be at position 0 in
the first buffer). If the start signal is just distributed
Warning!!! Commercial Post!!!
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Gregorio Garcia Karman
ggkar...@musicologia.com wrote:
On 7 Dec, 2012, at Fri 7 Dec 14:56 , Andrew Horsburgh
andrew.horsbu...@uws.ac.uk wrote:
That with the matrix is interesting. Do you mean controlling the gain of
the inputs
Am 07.12.2012 20:16, schrieb Jörn Nettingsmeier:
as mentioned by someone else, rme hdsps can be ganged. _but_ i've seen
weird timing issues with an old hdsp madi pci and a hdsp madi pcie -
they would be in perfect sync, but with random offsets of plus/minus
several hundred samples, apparently
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 12:12:15PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
i could imagine how a situation like you describe could come about
when wiring the cards this way, but it feels a bit weird. iiuc,
connecting each card to an always-active wc source directly should
have avoided the issue,
On 12/09/2012 06:20 PM, Michael Chapman wrote:
Been lurking (with interest (and financial envy ;-) ) :
Jörn wrote:
but with the
andiamo you get rid of the toslink risk,
Could you explain, that comment ?
Thanks in advance, Michael.
the andiamo is a MADI device, hence no adat
...@music.vt.edu [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf
Of Gregorio Garcia Karman [ggkar...@musicologia.com]
Sent: 07 December 2012 12:15
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] 256 channel out system - recommendations ?
Lots of people quite surprised/horrified . Differing
HI Jorn,
Thanks for the well informed reply as usual.
honestly, for a system like that, i wouldn't think about windows even for
a split second. there is really only one sane system choice, and that is
clearly linux. for your frontend and user experience, by all means go with
windows if it
On 7 Dec, 2012, at Fri 7 Dec 08:38 , Gregorio Garcia Karman
ggkar...@musicologia.com wrote:
and 8 of these:
https://www.kmraudio.com/focusrite-r...-interface.phphttps://www.kmraudio.com/focusrite-rednet-5-interface.php
might be good though :- down to £10,000 !
would you mind posting
Lots of people quite surprised/horrified . Differing yes - but if you look
at the result 80% of people voted for the Behringers - and this is one of
the largest communities of sound engineers on the web who would have been
listening on their own equipment at home/studio - sure a couple of
obviously Id love to spend millions of pounbds on the best sytem - but
these days getting any money at all for experimental arts projects is
challenging !
On 07/12/2012, Gregorio Garcia Karman ggkar...@musicologia.com wrote:
Dear Augustine, I guess you are right. Congratulations for your past
A 07/12/2012, às 17:05, Augustine Leudar escreveu:
Thanks Joseph,
Actually Miguel works in the same room as me but I haven't been in
much recently - Do you know if game of life can be adpated to do
height as well ?
Well, I do see you there from time to time... ;-)
No it doesn’t work with
yes Matts uses Vbap between two arrays for height - but only works on
windows thus far
On 7 December 2012 21:50, Miguel Negrao
miguel.negrao-li...@friendlyvirus.org wrote:
A 07/12/2012, às 17:05, Augustine Leudar escreveu:
Thanks Joseph,
Actually Miguel works in the same room as me
Question 1
anyone know how to do a 256 channel system ? - can you expand the rme with
an extra 64 channels somehow ? They would all need to be controlled by the
same clock so they were perfectly synchronised - perfect timing is even
more important than usual in WFS systems.
p 33 of the RME
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Gregorio Garcia Karman
ggkar...@musicologia.com wrote:
p 33 of the RME HDSPe MADI FX english manual: you may use up to three MADI
FX on one machine using OSX aggregation: The current driver supports up to
three HDSPe in any combination There seem to be
On 7 Dec, 2012, at Fri 7 Dec 03:12 , Augustine Leudar
augustineleu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
Actually the Behringers are petty good despite being Behringer they
actually outperformed an AD converter 20 times their price in a blind test
recently which left many engineers
15 matches
Mail list logo
