From what I remember from my post-purchase "let's see what we got in
here" look at it, it uses one of the eight channel + spdif digital
interface chips with four stereo codecs, rather than 5 USBUARTS - damned
if I can remember the part number. It's at work at present so I can't
check.
Memor
ve.mal...@york.ac.uk
> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
>
> On Mar 6 2011, Eric Benjamin wrote:
>
> > In a case such as the FA101 I'd be very tempted to make an internal
> > conversion to a 10-chan
On Mar 6 2011, Eric Benjamin wrote:
In a case such as the FA101 I'd be very tempted to make an internal
conversion to a 10-channel (analog) interface. I'm not at all sure what
the internal structure is like for the FA101.
So would I and that's probably what I will do when I need it :-). The
lems can occur
if it's B-format that is being recorded.
So, yah, I'd rather record B-format. What is your preference?
Eric
- Original Message
From: "dave.mal...@york.ac.uk"
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Sent: Sat, March 5, 2011 12:13:55 PM
Subject: R
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:57:52AM -0800, Eric Benjamin wrote:
> > would be happy with eight channels. (can i synch two zoom H2s?
>
> I was, in fact, fishing for your opinions on the number of channels.
> Personally, although I retain some sort of purist perspective that a
> complete
> 9-chan
sic.vt.edu
Sent: Sat, March 5, 2011 12:48:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
i would be happy with eight channels. (can i synch two zoom H2s?) i think
ambisonics will only take off if there are cheap simple systems that many
people can use. at home no
: Sat, March 5, 2011 12:48:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
i would be happy with eight channels. (can i synch two zoom H2s?) i think
ambisonics will only take off if there are cheap simple systems that many
people
can use. at home now i am sett
800
> From: eb...@pacbell.net
> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
>
> > how many recording channels will it need?
> How many would you like for it to be?
>
> Recording 9 channels for 2nd order is a lit
PM
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
dear eric
first question. how many recording channels will it need?
umashankar
i have published my poems. read (or buy) at http://stores.lulu.com/umashankar
> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 20:49:23 -0800
>
] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
>
>
>
> Peter Lennox wrote:
> > anyone taking something interesting to the Ambisonics symposium 2011 in
> >Kentucky?
>
>
> I'm planning on bring a prototype of a practical, affordable second-order
> so
Peter Lennox wrote:
> anyone taking something interesting to the Ambisonics symposium 2011 in
>Kentucky?
I'm planning on bring a prototype of a practical, affordable second-order
soundfield microphone. Of course it's not done yet, and perhaps I'm talking
through my hat. Why would I claim
11 matches
Mail list logo
