i would be happy with eight channels. (can i synch two zoom H2s?) i think 
ambisonics will only take off if there are cheap simple systems that many 
people can use. at home now i am setting up an eight speaker system, about 50 
watts per channel, with a total cost including an eight channel d/a of less 
than 400 USD. i only have to wire up the eighth loudspeaker (why does inertia 
kick in right at end? i can understand at the start. fear of failure?)
 
umashankar
 


i have published my poems. read (or buy) at http://stores.lulu.com/umashankar


 
> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:54:23 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
> 
> > how many recording channels will it need?
> How many would you like for it to be?
> 
> Recording 9 channels for 2nd order is a little unattractive in a world in 
> which 
> audio interfaces typically come in groups of 8. But if one is willing to 
> consider recording only horizontal (5 channels) or mixed order with 2nd-order 
> horizontal and 1st order vertical (6-channels), it becomes a lot more 
> tractable. 
> Both of those handily fit within the capabilities of the Tascam DR-680, for 
> instance. 
> 
> There are other considerations. Although we might like to record 
> periphonically 
> for a future-proof recording, therre are some real difficulties associated 
> with 
> trying to reproduce 2nd order material with-height using a loudspeaker array 
> that fits in a normal domestic room.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: umashankar mantravadi <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 9:14:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
> 
> 
> dear eric
> 
> first question. how many recording channels will it need?
> 
> umashankar
> 
> 
> i have published my poems. read (or buy) at http://stores.lulu.com/umashankar
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 20:49:23 -0800
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Sursound] Ambisonics symposium 2011: was help with links ...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Peter Lennox <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > anyone taking something interesting to the Ambisonics symposium 2011 in 
> > >Kentucky?
> > 
> > 
> > I'm planning on bring a prototype of a practical, affordable second-order 
> > soundfield microphone. Of course it's not done yet, and perhaps I'm talking 
> > through my hat. Why would I claim something that I haven't finished? To put 
> > the pressure on so that I do finish!
> > 
> > Eric
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sursound mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110305/5b14d8fd/attachment.html>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
                                          
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110305/d726d32d/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to