I had a look, but I have a few problems..
I don't seem able to play 1a.
The test is not blind as the curious, like me, can see the file names in
the source.
The Longcat eg.1b is the clear winner.
I cannot force myself to listen to that much filtered noise - it seems
pointless and unpleasant!
Hey David
Thanks for your time. The survey loads some files very slow this is why
the were not present.
Not sure if Longcat is going to win, Harpex seems to do is the best
When i listend i thought New Audio was the best.
It's idd unpleasant next time i will take some other samples.
and thanks
I had a similar problem with the BBC's efforts:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radio3/2011/12/the-festival-of-nine-lessons-and-carols-in-surround-sound.shtml
In that case I could not dowload them and switch quickly between
versions. All that I could usefully say is that they all sounded bad,
and
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:19:53PM +, dw wrote:
I have a problem with band-filtered noise. I don't think it tell you
anything very useful, as the results are only applicable to
band-filtered noise, and often anechoic HRTFS are used too, this
means it has zero relevance in everyday
On 08/01/2014 17:29, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:19:53PM +, dw wrote:
I have a problem with band-filtered noise. I don't think it tell you
anything very useful, as the results are only applicable to
band-filtered noise, and often anechoic HRTFS are used too, this
Dear All
I see the most interesting things passing by in this mailing list.
This made me decided to do my thesis about binaural localization.
I have made two experiments to test three different binaural panners
and the accuracy of the localization.
1. New Audio Technology, Spatial Audio
