Re: [Sursound] Jacktrip (bandwidth)

2011-06-11 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 06/10/2011 06:47 PM, Michael Chapman wrote: Not sure I am the best person to answer this ... but as I asked the initial question. On Linux AND Mac, 'Jack' (not Jacktrip) allows one to 'patch' audio applications and input/output sockets together (hence jack, as in jack plug). Jacktrip is one

Re: [Sursound] Jacktrip (bandwidth)

2011-06-10 Thread Eric Benjamin
, for that matter. Eric - Original Message From: Michael Chapman s...@mchapman.com To: Surround Sound discussion group sursound@music.vt.edu Sent: Wed, June 8, 2011 3:02:03 AM Subject: [Sursound] Jacktrip (bandwidth) I can't find any indicative performance (bandwidth) figures for Jacktrip

Re: [Sursound] Jacktrip (bandwidth)

2011-06-09 Thread Dave Malham
That does seem very surprising - last century (literally!) I regularly used to send 8 channel, 16 bit, 48k audio around our building via 100baseT cabling with no problems, using Snack server technology under TCL/Tk on SGI Irix machines - even 10baseT could handle it if there was no other

[Sursound] Jacktrip (bandwidth)

2011-06-08 Thread Michael Chapman
I can't find any indicative performance (bandwidth) figures for Jacktrip ... so ask for the experience of others. On a standard CAT-5 cable between two adjacent machines I can get four (mono) channels at 48 KHz, but trying to set channels 4 just results in a (very silent) failure to connect.

Re: [Sursound] Jacktrip (bandwidth)

2011-06-08 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 06/08/2011 12:02 PM, Michael Chapman wrote: I can't find any indicative performance (bandwidth) figures for Jacktrip ... so ask for the experience of others. On a standard CAT-5 cable between two adjacent machines I can get four (mono) channels at 48 KHz, but trying to set channels4 just