Le 2013-04-29 16:07, Eric Benjamin a écrit :
Calibration of Soundfield Microphones using the Diffuse-Field Response
http://www.aes.org/tmpFiles/elib/20130429/16453.pdf
A second-order soundfield microphone with improved polar pattern shape
http://www.aes.org/tmpFiles/elib/20130429/16470.pdf
The
discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] what mics do you use?
I'd like to expand just a bit on what Dave said.
The narrowing of the pattern of microphones at high frequencies is equivalent
to the addition of higher order spherical harmonics into the directionality. I
recently went through the exercise
Eero Aro skrev 29.4.2013 14:28:
Discussions about the various miking systems for surround sound
and Ambisonics can be found in the Sursound archives. This subject
surfaces every now and then.
Another one also with Pearl capsules here: http://nu47.com/NU-880F.pdf
Yes, I finally got this far...
Yes Martin!
This is in my wish list for sure
Hope you are well...
Mauricio
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Martin Kantola mar...@nordicaudiolabs.com wrote:
Eero Aro skrev 29.4.2013 14:28:
Discussions about the various miking systems for surround sound
and Ambisonics can
Ok, you have two problems with large capsules. Firstly there's the standard
one of the basic directionality going off. The directional patterns of any
capsules degrades as the frequency goes up, due to interference effects,
and this happens at lower frequencies with larger capsules. Secondly if
dave.mal...@york.ac.uk
To: Surround Sound discussion group sursound@music.vt.edu
Sent: Mon, April 29, 2013 9:28:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Sursound] what mics do you use?
Ok, you have two problems with large capsules. Firstly there's the standard
one of the basic directionality going off. The directional
Hello Matthew,
I know you already received accurate and detailed responses to your question,
but thought I'd add something.
The ears, by themselves, are essentially omnidirectional. They're akin to most
pressure mics with no rearward venting. The head shapes the sound (ITDs,
ILDs... the stuff
Given the subject of mics:
Has anyone experience with this here:
http://www.nevatonmics.com/pdf/Nevaton_Flyer_centerfold_v2.pdf
Looks like since the four capsules are individually wired, it could be used for
1st order HOA recording.
Ronald
-- next part --
A non-text
On 2013-04-25, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Looks like since the four capsules are individually wired, it could be
used for 1st order HOA recording.
1st order pantophony, I think. The details are somewhat sparse, but I at
least get the feeling the four mics are wired into the horizontal plane.
At 15:29 25-04-13, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Given the subject of mics:
Has anyone experience with this here:
http://www.nevatonmics.com/pdf/Nevaton_Flyer_centerfold_v2.pdf
Their mics are expensive, though they look nice on the outside and
the electronics appear to be good; but the
Of Sampo Syreeni
Sent: 23 April 2013 20:06
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] what mics do you use?
On 2013-04-23, Augustine Leudar wrote:
I dont even think you can make proper binaural recordings as you wont
have shoulder reflections (important elevation cue
On 2013-04-24, Peter Lennox wrote:
It's only a tiny point, but Sampo, you said ... because our vertical
resolution is so bad... Strictly, our perception in the vertical
plane isn't the same as in elevation, except for the special case
where the head is kept still, not tilted.
Fully granted.
I had a really nice diagram that showed the hearing accuracy (MAAs etc) of
different positions in the azimuth and elevation but I cant find it . If I
remember rightly its generally true that horizontal localisation is better
than vetrtical with a couple of exceptions - If I remember rightly
many thanks to many people.
- matt
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130424/e04041f2/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
I think he missed the Soundfield ST450 as well, didn't he?:
http://www.soundfield.com/products/st450.php
Regards,
John
(Happy ST450 and TetraMic User)
On 24 Apr 2013, at 21:41, Martin Leese martin.le...@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
Eric missed only the Russian made Octava
Can you make ambisonic mixes with this: 3diosound.com?
It's much cheaper than http://www.core-sound.com/TetraMic/1.php.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130423/9ced216d/attachment.html
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Sent: Tue, April 23, 2013 11:02:28 AM
Subject: [Sursound] what mics do you use?
Can you make ambisonic mixes with this: 3diosound.com?
It's much cheaper than http://www.core-sound.com/TetraMic/1.php.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment
recordings with a binaural microphone.
At
least not directly.
Eric Benjamin
- Original Message
From: Matthew Palmer palme...@mymail.vcu.edu
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Sent: Tue, April 23, 2013 11:02:28 AM
Subject: [Sursound] what mics do you use?
Can you make ambisonic
On 2013-04-23, Augustine Leudar wrote:
I dont even think you can make proper binaural recordings as you wont
have shoulder reflections (important elevation cue) or as Eric has
already mentioned, the head, which will affect the ILDs and ITDs.
Under heavy assumptions you can, because our
On 23 April 2013 21:05, Matthew Palmer palme...@mymail.vcu.edu wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up. Which mics do you use?
My 2 cents worth. For binaural recording I have used the Bruel and Kjaer type
4101 setup:
http://www.bksv.com/products/transducers/acoustic/binaural-headsets/4101.aspx
On 23 April 2013 21:05, Matthew Palmer palme...@mymail.vcu.edu wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up. Which mics do you use?
Another 2 cents worth. For Ambisonic recording there are a few alternatives.
Soundfield research has several models, mostly based on the original Calrec
design.
21 matches
Mail list logo
