Let me be blunt: there's a lot to be said about HOA in theoretical terms, it's
wonderful, exciting, yet totally irrelevant:
When it comes to localizing sounds, when I sit in the sofa at home, I'm not
trying to shoot the second violin by sound, I just want a natural sounding,
enjoyable
Hi Jörn,
On May 1, 2011, at 9:39 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
for me, 1st order horizontal is nice but on the brink of collapsing due
to ambiguous source localosation, 1st order peri tips it over the edge.
that's with my sound engineer's ear, not with my music appreciation ear.
paul's
2011/5/2 Jörn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net:
those slightly more speakers than necessary cases are a bit tricky...
first order over a 24 hemisphere is horrible,
At the 2008 demo I wrote about, other that the anomaly at the exact
center, I thought it sounded pretty good. So did
Wow - I have a few days break and the list goes mad - and all set off by the appearance of a 30+
year old hardware box up for sale!
On 01/05/2011 19:18, Martin Leese wrote
My recollection from a 1980s telephone
conversation with Minim was that the
production AD 10 decoders did not have
On 01/05/2011 23:09, Richard Dobson wrote:
how can localisation and separation be distinct?
I think the two words are too useful to be treated as exact synonyms - that would mean one of them
is simply wasted. So I would say the former is absolute - this or that degree azimuth. The latter
Dave Malham wrote:
he used Audio Design gear himself, so
decoders with shelf filters, even though it supposedly does not help
over large areas...and he even used UHJ a lot.
I remember John once told that instead of a square arrangement
he had sometimes arranged four speakers in an arc behind
On 3 May 2011, at 13:08, Richard Dobson wrote:
My proposed application is not music listening as such, but sonification of
particle collisions in the LHC. In the data, Z is the beam axis, and the most
interesting stuff has high transverse momentum, i.e. left right up down
across the beam
/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110503/66b29baf/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110503/66b29baf/attachment.html
Here is a post that makes sense in the real world.
Of course it is intriguing to work out how
to create the impression of a mosquito circling around
your head. But it is really not important musically.
What is wrong with stereo?
1 It is all in front
2 It is too LITTLE. Real orchestras are 15
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:15:29PM +0530, umashankar mantravadi wrote:
in fact angelo recommended that i arrange the eight speakers as two crossed
squares. two speakers in front and back, and four speakers mid bottom left
and right and mid top left and right, the only problem is i do not
Anyone built their own InstaSnake equivalent? If so, care to share?
Thanks,
John
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:15:29PM +0530, umashankar mantravadi wrote:
in fact angelo recommended that i arrange the eight speakers as two crossed
squares. two speakers in front and back, and four speakers mid bottom
Martin Leese martin.le...@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
...
I have
collected information about the Minim
decoders, and made it available at:
https://sites.google.com/site/minimdecoders/
...
If you know of
more information then please pass it on to me
so that I can add it to the site.
Geoffrey
Dear List,
I am now trying to measure the frequency response of a headphone and a
loudspeaker using RohdeSchwarz UPV Audio Analyzer.
While, I am wondering whether I can directly get the frequency response (the
ratio of input to output) using this Audio Analyzer.
And is anyone have the quite
15 matches
Mail list logo
