Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-03-04 Thread Dave Malham
Yep, that certainly agrees with my experience in the past with earlier and cruder decoders over larger areas. Dave On 3 March 2016 at 23:40, Aaron Heller wrote: > In BLaH11 (AES 137, 10/2014, Los Angeles) , Eric and I compared horizontal > FOA over a 2-meter radius

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-03-03 Thread Aaron Heller
In BLaH11 (AES 137, 10/2014, Los Angeles) , Eric and I compared horizontal FOA over a 2-meter radius 4-speaker diamond vs. 8-speaker octagon with binaural dummy head measurements and listening tests. (classic decoding: 2-band, rV=1 at LF, rE=sqrt(1/2) at HF, 400 Hz xover, NFC). The TL;DR summary

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-03-03 Thread Martin Leese
Martin Leese wrote: > Peter Lennox wrote: >> Following on from discussions of decoder solutions: Forgive me if I've >> missed this (I've been watching sursound for about 20 years, or so - but >> I >> just may have missed the odd discussion!) >> >> Has anyone systematically studied the

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-23 Thread Marc Lavallee
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:21:06 +0100 Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > On 02/22/2016 09:28 PM, Martin Leese wrote: > > Peter Lennox wrote: > > > >> Following on from discussions of decoder solutions: Forgive me > >> if I've missed this (I've been watching sursound for

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-23 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/22/2016 09:28 PM, Martin Leese wrote: Peter Lennox wrote: Following on from discussions of decoder solutions: Forgive me if I've missed this (I've been watching sursound for about 20 years, or so - but I just may have missed the odd discussion!) Has anyone systematically studied the

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-22 Thread Peter Lennox
] Sent: 22 February 2016 20:58 To: sursound@music.vt.edu Subject: Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders? Ok, here. I put it in my DB: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22100835/Comparative%20study%20of%20effective%20soundfield%20reconstruction%20Furlong%20AES

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-22 Thread Eero Aro
Ok, here. I put it in my DB: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22100835/Comparative%20study%20of%20effective%20soundfield%20reconstruction%20Furlong%20AES%20198909012014_.pdf I won't keep it there for a long time. Please download. Eero ___

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-22 Thread Eero Aro
Here's one paper Dermot that was involved with: http://tinyurl.com/jnsla88 Can't find the other one... Eero ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-22 Thread Peter Lennox
] On Behalf Of Martin Leese [martin.le...@stanfordalumni.org] Sent: 22 February 2016 20:28 To: sursound@music.vt.edu Subject: Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders? Peter Lennox wrote: > Following on from discussions of decoder solutions: Forgive me if I've >

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-22 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/22/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Lennox wrote: Following on from discussions of decoder solutions: Forgive me if I've missed this (I've been watching sursound for about 20 years, or so - but I just may have missed the odd discussion!) Has anyone systematically studied the interactions between

[Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

2016-02-22 Thread Peter Lennox
Following on from discussions of decoder solutions: Forgive me if I've missed this (I've been watching sursound for about 20 years, or so - but I just may have missed the odd discussion!) Has anyone systematically studied the interactions between decoders, speaker layouts and particular