Thanks to everyone who has already expressed interest! Definitely looking like it may be a go on the
project. I'll keep sursound informed as I do preliminary studies this summer.
Dave
On 05/07/2012 22:25, Gerard Lardner wrote:
+1 here too.
Gerard Lardner
On 05/07/2012 14:41, Hugh
On 07/04/2012 06:40 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu a écrit :
Yum has gotten much faster recently, but I have no idea how it
compares with apt today. IMHO it is as easy to use as apt (ie: it is
functionally equivalent), but it may be slow (perhaps to
It will be balanced - not looking at anything else, especially as all dacs of any quality have
balanced outs. My initial thoughts for a a Kickstarter reward structure is to do the usual special
for early adopters which would, in this case, be what amounts to a cape (I'm wary of doing an actual
where do i sign up. have you started a kickstarter page? umashankar
i have published my poems. read (or buy) at http://stores.lulu.com/umashankar
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:57:07 +0100
From: dave.mal...@york.ac.uk
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] preferred (small) linux
Dave,
You can include me in, as well.
John
On 5 Jul 2012, at 15:16, Dave Malham wrote:
Not yet, I'm just testing the waters, so to speak, at present. I'm hopefully
going to be doing some preliminary tests over the summer, but I won't be able
to start serious work until late autumn as I
+1 here too.
Gerard Lardner
On 05/07/2012 14:41, Hugh Pyle wrote:
+1. If you design a BeagleBone cape with 16 channels out (balanced or
not, I don't really mind), or a dedicated system that includes the
CPU, I'll want several :-)
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:16 AM, GP ga...@activatedspace.com
[mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On
Behalf Of Augustine Leudar
Sent: den 4 juli 2012 13:07
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] preferred (small) linux distro for audio?
Have you tried upgrading ubuntu to ubuntu studio ?
On 4 July 2012 11:41, Dave Malham dave.mal
...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On
Behalf Of Bo-Erik Sandholm
Sent: den 4 juli 2012 13:34
To: Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] preferred (small) linux distro for audio?
We should not fight over distributions ... But Avlinux has one advantage
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:41:53AM +0100, Dave Malham wrote:
I'm looking for recommendations on a preferred (small) Linux
distro for surround work. To start with, I'd like to run on a Asus
35 M1-M Pro motherboard as I have one handy. Unfortunately, my
current Ubuntu distro seems to have
dave.mal...@york.ac.uk
To: Surround Sound discussion group sursound@music.vt.edu
Sent: Wed, July 4, 2012 3:42:11 AM
Subject: [Sursound] preferred (small) linux distro for audio?
Hi folks,
I'm looking for recommendations on a preferred (small) Linux distro for
surround work. To start with, I'd
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:19:05PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 07/04/2012 06:51 PM, Eric Benjamin wrote:
I have almost no experience in this, but it seems like this discussion would
be
incomplete without mentioning the Planet CCRMA distribution:
I can second the recommendation for Planet CCRMA. I've used it for
for audio work for a decade (since Red Hat 7 days) on various mini-ITX
based systems and laptops. 'Nando Lopez-Lezcano (the maintainer) and
others on the mailing list are helpful and quick to reply.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:51
I use the KXStudio distribution based on the latest Ubuntu 12.04
LTS (Long Term Support). Two installation methods are proposed with a
live-dvd (easiest) or a small netboot iso (prefered). It's also
possible to use the kxstudio packages with a normal Ubuntu (my method).
On 07/04/2012 01:44 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
[MUNCH]...
But I much prefer Debian based distributions (like
Ubuntu) for their APT packaging system (instead of RPM on Fedora based
distributions).
Caveat (apt != rpm):
underlying package system: .deb packages in Debian, .rpm packages in Fedora
I stopped using RedHat (before Fedora) in favour of Debian, to get out
of the RPM dependency hell. At the time, there was no YUM to resolve
the package dependencies, like APT does so well. But I remember my
experience with YUM on the XO computer (from the OLPC project); it was
was extremely slow.
15 matches
Mail list logo
