In
https://www.waves.com/ambisonics-explained-guide-for-sound-engineers it says:
"...there are two conventions within the Ambisonics B-format
standard: AmbiX and FuMa. They are quite similar, but not
interchangeable: they differ by the sequence in which the four
channels are arranged..."
Co
FuMa is WXYZ and ambiX is WYZX with SN3D normalisation.
I forget the gains off the top of my head, but will have a look and get back if
no one else has chipped in.
J
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/list
--On 14 April 2018 10:17 +0200 David Pickett wrote:
> (I am working with separate B-format wavfiles -- not multichannel
> wavfiles -- and as far as I can find there are no plugins for this
> situation.)
There are many reasons not to use Steinberg's WaveLab for ambisonics
(though it works fine fo
I'd be very interested to know the argument behind that.
Although bass response is affected by size in speakers I don't know of
any reason for that in microphones.
Chris Woolf
On 13/04/2018 18:58, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 04/13/2018 10:23 AM, Jack Reynolds wrote:
That’s what I thou
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Jack Reynolds wrote:
> FuMa is WXYZ and ambiX is WYZX with SN3D normalisation.
> I forget the gains off the top of my head, but will have
> a look and get back if no one else has chipped in.
Convert FuMa to Ambix
-
ACN-0 = 1.4142
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:49:07AM +0100, Chris Woolf wrote:
> I'd be very interested to know the argument behind that.
>
> Although bass response is affected by size in speakers I don't know of any
> reason for that in microphones.
This has little to do with response, and all with directivity.
Magik Door LTD
Company Number : NI635217
Registered 63 Ballycoan rd,
Belfast BT88LL
www.magikdoor.net
+44(0)7719456112
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180414/47e95d30/attachm
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 01:20:17PM +0100, Augustine Leudar wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else will get the same effect - but playing this
> album on my laptop speakers :
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8wUKUBAXMk
>
> The sound seems to be hovering about several inches to the left of my
> l
ailable
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180414/e581c112/attachment.png>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
I have never used Steinberg's Wavelab for anything. :) But it sounds
like it has similar drawbacks to the otherwise excellent Samplitude,
which I DO use.
Incidentally, one of the drawbacks of multichannel wavfiles for HOA
is their large size for any reasonable length of musical composition.
A
Thanks, Fons. I was hoping it was something as simple as this. I
failed to find anything on the internet that expresses the
relationships so simply. Did I actually miss a page?
David
At 12:55 14-04-18, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Jack Reynolds wrote:
>
>>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 05:42:11PM +0200, David Pickett wrote:
> Incidentally, one of the drawbacks of multichannel wavfiles for HOA is their
> large size for any reasonable length of musical composition. At 48kHz, a
> 9-channel 2nd order file takes c. 74MB for 1 minute of music. Alternatively,
>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 05:28:57PM +0200, David Pickett wrote:
> Thanks, Fons. I was hoping it was something as simple as this. I failed to
> find anything on the internet that expresses the relationships so simply.
> Did I actually miss a page?
Not one I know of. Some of my programs (e.g. Ambdec
or options, view archives and so on.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180414/5cadd91c/attachment.html>
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@musi
At 17:51 14-04-18, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 05:42:11PM +0200, David Pickett wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, one of the drawbacks of multichannel wavfiles for
HOA is their
>> large size for any reasonable length of musical composition. At 48kHz, a
>> 9-channel 2nd order file ta
Le 2018-04-14 à 01:22 PM, David Pickett a écrit :
At 17:51 14-04-18, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 05:42:11PM +0200, David Pickett wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, one of the drawbacks of multichannel wavfiles for HOA
is their
>> large size for any reasonable length of musical compo
RF64 is also an option for 64bit WAV files via libsndfile.
I am attempting to add BW64 to the library for ADM purposes, but it’s taking a
while.
J
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - uns
I can handle those. :)
At 20:08 14-04-18, Jack Reynolds wrote:
>
>RF64 is also an option for 64bit WAV files via libsndfile.
>I am attempting to add BW64 to the library for ADM purposes, but
>itâs taking a while.
>
>___
>Sursound mailing list
>Sursoun
Director Magik Door LTD
Company Number : NI635217
Registered 63 Ballycoan rd,
Belfast BT88LL
www.magikdoor.net
+44(0)7719456112
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180414/b8cc235d/attachment.h
Buried in the release notes of the the latest DaVinci Resolve beta release
is mention of a 3d audio panner for working with "advanced surround formats
such as Auro 3d and NHK 22.2 (more information about specific support for
these and other formats will come later)." It doesn't appear to be
impleme
20 matches
Mail list logo
