On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:08:44 +0100
Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > First patch is somewhat unrelated. While fixing this I was trying to
> > get the logic of read_image(). The last part is unnecessary complex.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi,
> First patch is somewhat unrelated. While fixing this I was trying to
> get the logic of read_image(). The last part is unnecessary complex. The
> if(!error || !ret) should always be true. The only reason I can think
> of is rebo
Hi!
> First patch is somewhat unrelated. While fixing this I was trying to
> get the logic of read_image(). The last part is unnecessary complex. The
> if(!error || !ret) should always be true. The only reason I can think
> of is reboot() failing. This patch just removes that `if' and adds
> some
Hi,
I got some bug reports and unwanted behavior by resume. The problem
boiled down to the fact that resume treats 'no image in partition' as a
regular, while it is of course expected behavior on a normal boot.
Some symptoms that will be fixed by these patches
- resume sets console loglevel to so
