Hi!
> > > I think we can do one more thing. Namely, if the header is not
> > > continuous,
> > > the kernel will leave the first continuous PAGE_SIZE "block" of the swap
> > > file
> > > untouched. So, why don't we copy the swap signature into that "block",
> > > to the place in which it would
On Sunday, 12 November 2006 01:00, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On 11/11/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday, 11 November 2006 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > Yeah :)
> > > >
> > > > Looks good, one small comment below.
> > > >
> > > > _Howe
On Sunday, 12 November 2006 01:28, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On 11/12/06, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But AFAICS the offset is only needed for swap_type_of(); instead using
> > the extents it may be possible to use somehow the 'struct file'
> > (f_path? sounds interesting :D) for
On 11/12/06, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But AFAICS the offset is only needed for swap_type_of(); instead using
> the extents it may be possible to use somehow the 'struct file'
> (f_path? sounds interesting :D) for swapfiles.
Ok, I think you can find the swapfile by matching
swap
On 11/11/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 11 November 2006 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > Yeah :)
> > >
> > > Looks good, one small comment below.
> > >
> > > _However_,
> > >
> > > I think we can do one more thing. Namely, if the header is no
Hi,
On Saturday, 11 November 2006 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Yeah :)
> >
> > Looks good, one small comment below.
> >
> > _However_,
> >
> > I think we can do one more thing. Namely, if the header is not continuous,
> > the kernel will leave the first continuous PAGE_SIZE "block
Hi!
> > Yeah :)
>
> Looks good, one small comment below.
>
> _However_,
>
> I think we can do one more thing. Namely, if the header is not continuous,
> the kernel will leave the first continuous PAGE_SIZE "block" of the swap file
> untouched. So, why don't we copy the swap signature into tha
On Friday, 10 November 2006 18:59, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > On Thursday, 9 November 2006 22:30, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > > On 11/9/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I think that the swap header nee
Il Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:35:13PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> On Thursday, 9 November 2006 22:30, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > On 11/9/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think that the swap header need not be continuous. This actually also
> > > follows from the sy
On Thursday, 9 November 2006 22:30, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On 11/9/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that the swap header need not be continuous. This actually also
> > follows from the sys_swapon() code which reads one page from the file
> > using its mapping. It loo
On 11/9/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that the swap header need not be continuous. This actually also
> follows from the sys_swapon() code which reads one page from the file
> using its mapping. It looks like setup_swap_extents() omits the first
> continuous PAGE_SIZE
On Thursday, 9 November 2006 17:46, Luca wrote:
> Il Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:38:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > On Thursday, 9 November 2006 00:32, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > > On 11/8/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, 8 Novemb
Il Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:38:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> On Thursday, 9 November 2006 00:32, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > On 11/8/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, 8 November 2006 18:58, Luca wrote:
> > > > I've been working on a sm
On Thursday, 9 November 2006 00:32, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On 11/8/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 8 November 2006 18:58, Luca wrote:
> > > I've been working on a small program to find the first valid block of a
> > > swapfile. If I understand it cor
On 11/8/06, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, 8 November 2006 18:58, Luca wrote:
> > I've been working on a small program to find the first valid block of a
> > swapfile. If I understand it correctly we need the first contiguos cluster
> > of blocks (not counting
Hi,
On Wednesday, 8 November 2006 18:58, Luca wrote:
> I've been working on a small program to find the first valid block of a
> swapfile. If I understand it correctly we need the first contiguos cluster
> of blocks (not counting the header) which is at least PAGE_SIZE big and
> the starting block
16 matches
Mail list logo
