[Suspend-devel] [PATCH] PARAM_NO of by one

2006-09-03 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, If I can count, than PARAM_NO is of by one;) GEN_PARAM is defined as 8, which is correct because there is no #ifdef SPLASH_CONFIG anymore. SPLASH_PARAM still adds one to PARAM_NO though. This crashes s2disk/resume when there's an error in the config file. --- swsusp.h-- 2006-09-03 20:56:3

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] PARAM_NO of by one

2006-09-03 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sun 2006-09-03 21:06:12, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Hi, > > If I can count, than PARAM_NO is of by one;) > > GEN_PARAM is defined as 8, which is correct because there is no #ifdef > SPLASH_CONFIG anymore. SPLASH_PARAM still adds one to PARAM_NO though. > > This crashes s2disk/resume when there's

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] PARAM_NO of by one

2006-09-03 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:49:57 +0200 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun 2006-09-03 21:06:12, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If I can count, than PARAM_NO is of by one;) > > > > GEN_PARAM is defined as 8, which is correct because there is no > > #ifdef SPLASH_CONFIG anymore. SPLAS

Re: [Suspend-devel] [PATCH] PARAM_NO of by one

2006-09-03 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sun 2006-09-03 23:53:47, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:49:57 +0200 > Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun 2006-09-03 21:06:12, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > If I can count, than PARAM_NO is of by one;) > > > > > > GEN_PARAM is defined as 8, which is c