On Saturday, 11 August 2007 21:08, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Current implementation does not cleanup console settings if abort was
> selected by user.
> This should fix it.
I prefer the appended patch.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
suspend.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index:
Hi,
On Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:32, Couriousous wrote:
> Hello
>
> Here is an easy way to speed up the image writing. It simply tell the kernel
> to
> immediatly start writing the data to disk asynchronously and not to do the
> traditional
> buffering.
>
> Mesurement:
> System: pentium D8
On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 21:30, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:50:12 +0300
> "Alon Bar-Lev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > The question is: Why cannot I switch from one vt to another during image
> > write?
> > I guess some lock out somewhere at freeze something...
> > I will
Hello,
I have this laptop:
# s2ram -i
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Hewlett-Packard "
sys_product = "Compaq nx7010 (DU394T#ABZ) "
sys_version = "F.55"
bios_version = "68BAL Ver. F.55"
It works correctly on Debian SID with:
booting to /bin/bash
no fram
Hello
Le mercredi 15 août 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:32, Couriousous wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Here is an easy way to speed up the image writing. It simply tell the
> > kernel to immediatly start writing the data to disk asynchronously and
> > not to
On Wednesday, 15 August 2007 17:20, Couriousous wrote:
> Hello
>
> Le mercredi 15 août 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:32, Couriousous wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > Here is an easy way to speed up the image writing. It simply tell the
> > > kernel
On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:00, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, in this context you're right, but this was not clear from the
> > > original
> > > post.
> > >
> > > Moreover, the p
On Monday, 6 August 2007 11:23, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > > -#!/bin/bash
> > > +#!/bin/sh -x
> > >
> >
> > What is "sh -x"?
> >
>
> Good catch!
> I had some issues with this script... -x allows debugging...
> Here is an update
On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:42, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Second, what I didn't like is not the whole idea, but the context in
> > > which you
> > > used the word "License". I think you jus
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 00:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 3 August 2007 23:14, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Friday 03 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:15, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > encrypt variable conflict with glibc::encrypt()
> > > >
On Sunday, 5 August 2007 19:48, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > 1. Move main() out of s2ram.c into s2ram-main.c, this will enable s2ram.o
> > > to be included
> > > in both s2ram and s2both without recompilation.
> > >
> > > 2. Split whitelist.c into whitelist.h/whitelist.c as including .c is
On 8/15/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 August 2007 17:20, Couriousous wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Le mercredi 15 août 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:32, Couriousous wrote:
> > > > Hello
> > > >
> > > > Here is
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 00:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:36, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Friday 03 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:16, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > config.* conflicts with autoconf files.
> > > > Rename t
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 16:01, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > >
> > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > >
> > > > Well, what was this for?
> > >
> > > Debugging leds on port 80. I still have that
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 14:51, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> This allows you to specify an array of config_par, ending it with NULL
> name, so that you don't have to calculate the number of entries manually.
I have applied the patch.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
On Wednesday, 15 August 2007 18:43, Luca wrote:
> On 8/15/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 15 August 2007 17:20, Couriousous wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > Le mercredi 15 août 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, 11 August 2007
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 23:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This patch adds --splash argument to s2both, s2disk, resume.
> It is required especially for resume when you want to disable splash in
> initramfs
> as result of kernel parameter, even if it usually turned on on suspend.conf
>
T'h i+s g'e m is re.ally movab-l,e!!
T'h'i's o-n+e is real ly profi_ta'ble!!!
H-a*v.e y,o.u b-e e_n watc h_ing t.h+i's f-o r t'h.e l_a+s't w+e_e.k ?
T,a-k+e a l*o*o.k at it:
rec*ent n-e.w,s rel ease s s-e-n*t gen_erati'ng gr,owing i.nte,rest in C,Y-T-V
C-ompa+ny: C_HINA YOU_TV C.O*R,P ( O+T_
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:30:27 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 August 2007 23:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch adds --splash argument to s2both, s2disk, resume.
> > It is required especially for resume when you want to disable splash i
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 14:35, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Saturday 04 August 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > Hello Rafael,
> >
> > This is *UNTESTED* suggestion for switching into lzo without the memcpy.
> > Please see if I missed something as I the code combination of global
> > variables,
>
Hi,
The default s2ram configuration works on Ubuntu 7.0.4 (Fesity) out of the
box on my laptop, that is, just
s2ram -f
Also, all three of the following work:
s2ram -f -a 1
s2ram -f -a 2
s2ram -f -a 3
s2ram -i
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "ASUSTeK Computer INC."
sys
On 8/15/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 August 2007 21:08, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Current implementation does not cleanup console settings if abort was
> > selected by user.
> > This should fix it.
>
> I prefer the appended patch.
One of the k
On 8/15/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can malloc as much as you wish at initialization directly into
> > the pointers... I just don't understand what may go wrong if you do this...
>
> Nothing, really. I prefer to have two global pointers and one contiguous
> memory area
23 matches
Mail list logo
