Also this older database,
http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/dukeindex.html
Hakan
At 02:35 AM 10/25/2003, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
> Would anyone know how much oil you get out of a tonne of canola seed?
>
> It seems that our market boards in Canada sell seeds b
http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/nexus/Brassica_rapeseed_nex.html
Canola and rapeseed is the same, the Americans did not like the name
association.
Hakan
At 02:35 AM 10/25/2003, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
> Would anyone know how much oil you get out of a tonne of canola seed?
&
traditional
reactors continue, it could be a sort of poor mans nuclear program and give
the developing countries a chance to get something out of their uranium,
before they have to ship it to the developed countries.
Hakan
At 03:12 AM 10/24/2003, you wrote:
>Village invited to test cheap, cl
continuation of unnecessary waste in all sectors of society.
Hakan
At 04:12 AM 10/23/2003, you wrote:
>I have run across two terms and a document that help me reconcile with the
>"hydrogen economy" that will most likely be the main focus during the next
>20 years.
>
&g
>
>
>BASEL ACTION NETWORK
>
>--
>For immediate release:
>
>
>TOXIC SHIPS FROM USA NOT WELCOME IN EUROPE
>
>NEW REPORT CONDEMNS TOXIC ÎGHOST FLEETâ EXPORT
>
>Geneva, London. 22 October 2003. In the midst of growing European dissent
>over the impending arrival of the first four of 13 toxic,
>
>
>BASEL ACTION NETWORK
>
>--
>For immediate release:
>
>
>TOXIC SHIPS FROM USA NOT WELCOME IN EUROPE
>
>NEW REPORT CONDEMNS TOXIC ÎGHOST FLEETâ EXPORT
>
>Geneva, London. 22 October 2003. In the midst of growing European dissent
>over the impending arrival of the first four of 13 toxic,
economical and a lot safer. It would for
sure be needed.
Hakan
At 04:11 AM 10/22/2003, you wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:40:08 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >
> >MM,
> >
> >Formation and reformation of hydrogen/whatsoever combinations as storage
> >techniques are obviously
ower
immediately, or even drill as much as we can, the crises is still there.
Hakan
At 06:53 PM 10/21/2003, you wrote:
>I think that the beauty of the Ovonic system is that it uses process heat
>to release the H2 from the storage tanks. The heat generated either from
>an H2 ICE or a
energy should be originating from, because this is an open
question that everybody seems to do almost anything to avoid.
We have a major energy supply problem ahead of us, not a major energy
storage problem.
Hakan
At 01:51 PM 10/21/2003, you wrote:
>This article assumes onboard pressuri
avoided, but should be
minimized.
Hakan
**
If you want to take a look on a project
that is very close to my heart, go to:
http://energysavingnow.com/
http://hakan.vitools.net/ My .Net Card
http://hakan.vitools.org/ About me
http://vitools.com/ My
avoided, but should be
minimized.
Hakan
**
If you want to take a look on a project
that is very close to my heart, go to:
http://energysavingnow.com/
http://hakan.vitools.net/ My .Net Card
http://hakan.vitools.org/ About me
http://vitools.com/ My
Although I can see large advantages in hydrogen as storage in stationary
power generation and military mobile applications, I see that it is going
to take a long time before we see the hydrogen economy for propelling
transport in general.
Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles
http://energy.savin
Although I can see large advantages in hydrogen as storage in stationary
power generation and military mobile applications, I see that it is going
to take a long time before we see the hydrogen economy for propelling
transport in general.
Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles
http://energy.savin
Article in CNN,
World oil and gas "running out".
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/10/02/global.warming/index.html
Hakan
At 02:30 PM 10/19/2003, you wrote:
>MM,
>
>You are right, I slept now. Should be 29 and 900 billion and
>estimates of what is not found range between
MM,
You are right, I slept now. Should be 29 and 900 billion and
estimates of what is not found range between 1 and 3 trillion.
It was a good party. -:))
Hakan
At 11:38 AM 10/19/2003, you wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:02:35 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >
> >Sorry Bob,
> &g
move to
developed countries with the help of fossil fuels.
Hakan
At 03:35 PM 10/18/2003, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I wonder if the researchers have taken into account
>the growth by the developing countries like China and
>India on petroleum usage.
>
>2 billion people wanting to
Sorry Bob,
I just came from a very nice wedding party. Yearly use of oil is 29 trillion
barrel a year and total known reserves is around 900 trillion. It should also
say that our living space is very narrow in depth.
Hakan
At 02:38 AM 10/19/2003, you wrote:
>Bob,
>
>We must both
ng my question is very welcomed.
Hakan
At 08:20 PM 10/17/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan Falk wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > You also have to consider the absorption of uv by vegetation,
> > which uses it and store the energy, instead of radiating infrared.
> > Less vegetat
produce the heat trapping gases
and have always done.
I do not know enough, but I am not convinced that other do
either.
Hakan
At 05:35 PM 10/17/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan Falk wrote:
>
>
> The problem I have with this is the
> > one sided mirror thing, if the gas is reflective it
participation in a in depth discussion of my "of the hip" thoughts.
Hakan
At 07:13 AM 10/17/2003, you wrote:
>Honestly Hakan?
>
>One factor cannot be more important than another when they are all
>inter-related.
>
>Greenhouse gases give "cause" to greater latent
is country anyway, they must continue
to pay for this period.
Hakan
At 01:09 AM 10/17/2003, you wrote:
><http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2003/35/we_531_07.html>http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2003/35/we_531_07.html
>The Ungreening of America
>The Bottom Line
rations as you and I have.
Can you think about a more effective WMD, than the air pollution?
A bit slow, but anonymous and difficult to find the culprit.
Hakan
At 11:49 PM 10/16/2003, you wrote:
> > I further pessimistically predict that rather than do the right thing
> >when face
that determines who is getting it.
Hakan
PS, I do not mean to start an Iraq discussion again. -:))
At 10:45 PM 10/16/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan Falk wrote:
> > MM,
> >
> > Yes, the current known coal resources will last 233 years,
> > with current consumption.
>
>
nable model, which also can be used by developing
countries.
Hakan
At 07:47 PM 10/16/2003, you wrote:
> >> Apart from the faster depletion,
> >> which is very worrisome, the good
> >> news is that there are not enough
> >> fossil resources for worst cas
Aleklett especially comment on that they not specialists on the coal
situation,
but known estimates are included as I understand it. Download and read it, it
is around 2 Mb total.
Hakan
At 05:55 PM 10/16/2003, you wrote:
>on 10/16/03 8:25 AM, Hakan Falk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
Michael Allen
that only greenhouse gases might be a simplified opinion. I think that the
average change in the heat absorption coefficient for the earth surface
could even be a more important factor.
Hakan
**
If you want to take a look on a project
Masonry stoves can be sensitive to too high temperatures, so be careful
with this. Even using coal could be forming cracks, so be sure that your
masonry stove can take it, before you try.
Hakan
At 05:14 PM 10/14/2003, you wrote:
>Has any body tried mixing fryer oil and sawdust or ot
Martin,
I am not Californian and if I complain it would be like I am
getting into something that is "non of my business". So I
thought that a bit of irony and humor might be better. At
least he would understand my need for "American bashing". LOL
Hakan
At 03:29 AM 1
a bad idea
either.
Hakan
At 02:59 AM 10/14/2003, you wrote:
>This is a Press Release from Stuart, and so biased, but
>interesting nonetheless.
>
><http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/031009/95284_1.html>http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/031009/95284_1.html
>
>Press Release Source: Stuart Energy Syst
ince they reduce the risks with up to 90%. We
do not want to make a
mistake here, but on the other hand it might not be needed anyway, since
Americans care more
about their cars than their lives.
Hakan Falk
RE: Proposed Fuel Specification and Pump Labeling Requirements for
Biodiesel and Bi
ince they reduce the risks with up to 90%. We
do not want to make a
mistake here, but on the other hand it might not be needed anyway, since
Americans care more
about their cars than their lives.
Hakan Falk
RE: Proposed Fuel Specification and Pump Labeling Requirements for
Biodiesel and Bi
ince they reduce the risks with up to 90%. We
do not want to make a
mistake here, but on the other hand it might not be needed anyway, since
Americans care more
about their cars than their lives.
Hakan Falk
RE: Proposed Fuel Specification and Pump Labeling Requirements for
Biodiesel and Bi
ince they reduce the risks with up to 90%. We
do not want to make a
mistake here, but on the other hand it might not be needed anyway, since
Americans care more
about their cars than their lives.
Hakan Falk
RE: Proposed Fuel Specification and Pump Labeling Requirements for
Biodiesel and Bi
of the
opportunity to write and publish funny articles about Americans stupidity
and corruption level. I am not from California, so I will not be angry with
you if you introduce the requirements.
Hakan Falk
of the
opportunity to write and publish funny articles about Americans stupidity
and corruption level. I am not from California, so I will not be angry with
you if you introduce the requirements.
Hakan Falk
wind/solar energy and also the
opportunities it gives the developing world, together with biofuels. It is
also therefore I wanted some hands on experiences to write about. I have to
learn more and I still have some Bruel & Kjaer equipment that maybe still
works for sound measurement.
Hakan
A
No real news for this group, but interesting anyway.
Hakan
Germany tries to perfect diesel technology
The engine is the choice of industry, which cites less carbon dioxide pollution
By Andy Eckardt MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.com/news/596964.asp?0sp=v1ba#BODY
UNDER THE global climate treaty
. If
anyone have suggestions, I welcome them.
Hakan
PS. When I now participate in other lists, I am missing the
excellent link support and outstanding moderation that
Keith is giving us. He must put in a lot of work and we
must appreciate this.
At 02:12 AM 10/9/2003, you
and long 4 level old and
beautiful building with most of it occupied by offices. The other period.
we had
the office in the center of Gouda and I also had an apartment nearby.
Hakan
At 10:00 AM 10/8/2003, you wrote:
>Hallo Hakan,
>
>Thanks for taking the time to respond to my young n
Kirk,
Enjoyed to read and see your work, impressive.
Hakan
At 04:38 AM 10/8/2003, you wrote:
>Do it yourself Segway :)
>Kirk
>
><http://www.tlb.org/scooter.html>http://www.tlb.org/scooter.html
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--
Keith,
At 07:49 PM 10/7/2003, you wrote:
> >Keith,
> >
> >Link did not work for me, probably it was obsolete and
> >deleted after Bush published his energy plan.
> >
> >Hakan
>
>:-) Perhaps. But then why isn't the second one dead? - "Ho
Found it,
http://www.phact.org/e/dennis4.html
a great sit and very funny.
Hakan
At 07:08 PM 10/7/2003, you wrote:
>Keith,
>
>Link did not work for me, probably it was obsolete and
>deleted after Bush published his energy plan.
>
>Hakan
>
>
>At 05:51 PM 10/7
Keith,
Link did not work for me, probably it was obsolete and
deleted after Bush published his energy plan.
Hakan
At 05:51 PM 10/7/2003, you wrote:
>Merlin
>
> >Dear Keith,
> >
> >Your ridicule of alternative energy technologies, and fuel
> >efficiency improv
emistry, but
nothing new with hydrogen.
Hakan
At 02:40 PM 10/7/2003, you wrote:
>All the above sounds like an investigation worthy of the Spanish
>Inquisition. Prejudice in science and technology seems to work
>exactly the same way as in religion, health, and all other aspects
>of lif
in
biofuels and especially biodiesel. Apart from the well founded concerns
about platinum, this is like selling ice to Eskimos. -:))
Hakan
At 06:15 PM 10/7/2003, you wrote:
>Getting cancer isn't good for the wallet and I would rather inhale 0.1ppm
>cyanide than platinum. Metals t
en and
vehicles. If not, I am sure that other list members will improve it or have
different points of view. Only one thing, todays EVs and especially NEVs,
is very promising "ready for use" technologies and will even out
electricity use in a very practical way.
Hakan
At 01:57 PM 10/6
secure,
like power plants for peak demand coverage, than end use, like vehicles.
Initially, replacing NG for electricity, will probably be commercially
feasible
"ready for use" technology and using surplus from nuclear power plants.
Can you see the hidden agenda?
Hakan
At 06:08 PM
Hydrogen,
before we reach a situation were a surplus could be used for that, it will
take a very very long time.
Hakan
At 06:49 PM 10/3/2003, you wrote:
><http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/biztech/10/02/solar.cells.reut/index.html>http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/biztech/10/02/solar.cells.reut/i
?")
>
None that are connected to Internet today, can mention this things
without thinking of SPAM. Now I understand why water injection
systems are sold together with viagra and enlargement pills. LOL
Hakan
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-->
Buy
Maud,
I thought that you had no freezing problems at all in
St. Louis. But cold weather is not an objective matter.
I thing that you will be fine with pure biodiesel and no
other actions. Maybe you will have problems 20 days
in 5 years, but those days you can sleep in.
Hakan
At 01:48 AM 10/3
://journeytoforever that they cannot
miss the bifuel and the biofuel discussion list that are both on my site
and Keith's.
Hakan
At 10:42 PM 10/2/2003, you wrote:
>It looks like CNN finally decided to do a top story
>on this.
>
>
>World oil and gas 'running out'
>
><h
It looks like CNN finally decided to do a top story
on this.
World oil and gas 'running out'
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/10/02/global.warming/index.html
LOL, so now it is time to realize that it might be
important news.
Hakan
Yahoo! Grou
mix maybe
you need a 2 tank system with tank and line heaters, like for veg. oil.
Hakan
At 04:57 PM 10/2/2003, you wrote:
>Maud,
>
>In Europe, most tanks and fuel lines are dig down more than a meters depth
>in the earth, for security reasons. This means also that the oil
>temperat
for biodiesel, will be very expensive in a constant temperature layer and
probably not necessary (or necessary all year around).
If the tanks and fuel lines are above earth, it is an other question.
Hakan
At 01:25 PM 10/2/2003, you wrote:
>Can block, tank, or fuel line heaters be made to w
Hi Tan,
You might be more right than you know, so I will take the opportunity
to send the following message to FBI through this posting.
---
Dear FBI, I wish you best luck in the probing of the White House
naming of the CIA agent.
---
Hakan
At 11:36 AM 10/1/2003, you wrote:
>The FBI is
Quinn,
Very well said.
Hakan
At 07:13 AM 10/1/2003, you wrote:
>John,
>
>I just have to jump in here. As a nutritional counselor and herbalist for
>over 20 years, I have to disagree. It has been shown time and again that
>plants grown in soil which has been augmented
void biodiesel in US and
not in Europe, for the same engine, if it ever would be an issue.
Therefore they would not want to even have a court case tried,
because that would set a precedence against what in reality
is a scaremongers argument. I would not worry.
Hakan
At 06:35 PM 9/30/2003, you
with what you put in the
tank. What a healthy and clean place US would be and
biodiesel would be the preferred choice. LOL
Where is all the warranties and how can the body be
repaired as easy as a car. LOL
Hakan
At 05:30 PM 9/30/2003, you wrote:
>Aaron Ellringer wrote:
> > We should
Todd,
Again, you are right. I thought I said it in my last post.
Sorry if it was not clear enough and you felt it necessary
to repeat what you said.
Hakan
At 05:32 PM 9/28/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan,
>
>Conspiracy theories and true conspiracies are often indeed quite simple and
>
recent
and very costly events.
Hakan
At 08:56 AM 9/28/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan,
>
>One scenario is just as likely as another, not at all as "far fetched" as
>you would care to surmise.
>
>As it stands no one knows for absolute certain how Rudolf Diesel died. Might
ast. This will preferably be predictable dictatorships, not democracies
that will have difficulties to do the dirty work necessary to secure the
US/UK/French/Russian interests. Germany and Japan was neutralized
effectively after WWII. Russia is now forming a new life after the breakup
of the
- The outcome of a war that had not started and started 10 month
later, with an other assassination?
We will never know.
Hakan
At 08:56 PM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
>Forbs.com-
>In response to Hank Falk- While I do not have any proof of Diesel's
>Murder, I am of the opinion, that there
conspiration theories around his death, but never a firm
statement as you do and I am interested on what you base it on.
Maybe I have missed some revelations.
Hakan
At 12:47 AM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
>While it may be noble to support hybrid technology, Diesel
>technology-which Rudolf
alternative in general see,
Diesel engine, as a "ready for use" energy saving technology.
by Hakan Falk at Energy Saving Now.
<http://energy.saving.nu/biofuels/dieseltech.shtml>http://energy.saving.nu/biofuels/dieseltech.shtml
Hakan
At 12:47 AM 9/27/2003, you wrote:
>While th
rucks, they do a lot
>of the work.
Yes, I mean passenger cars. This even if the situation on trucks
also are low, compared to Europe, especially light trucks. SUVs
are of course destroying the statistics for light trucks, but even
considering this, diesel use is much lower.
Diesel engine, as
Tim,
Maybe you can copy the discussion about 2,000 gallons
of biodiesel to the Athena Project. Could be interesting if
we get going on it.
Hakan
At 03:13 AM 9/23/2003, you wrote:
>September 22, 2003
>For immediate release
>
>The New Athena Project, a Sustainable Energy Pol
lose the higher efficiency of diesels
(min. 25%) and suffer from the lack of availability of hydrogen
cars, but maybe that is worth it. -:))
Hakan
At 06:32 AM 9/26/2003, you wrote:
>Hello JD
>
> > >>Make it 2,000 gallon of biodiesel.
> > >>
> > >>Hakan
>
Make it 2,000 gallon of biodiesel.
Hakan
At 08:43 PM 9/25/2003, you wrote:
>Why not give anyone who buy a biodiesel compatible car a check for
>1000 gallon of B100, it is the same cost or cheaper. Would get the
>biodiesel production running, save imports and environment. Would
>s
difficult? Can it take
longer than developing a hydrogen car? Why do the Germans, French
and Japanese have them and the Americans not?
Hakan
At 02:23 PM 9/25/2003, you wrote:
> >Excerpt from an interview in the Detroit Free Press Yesterday: (Peter
> >Horton gave Kerry a ride in hi
is stopping US?
Hakan
At 12:41 PM 9/25/2003, you wrote:
>Addendum:
>
>You might find this link interesting.
>
><http://www.icta.org/projects/trans/rlprexsm.htm>http://www.icta.org/projects/trans/rlprexsm.htm
>
>On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:41:46 +0200, you wrote:
>
&g
a non-native language, but after losing the sight on my
right eye 10 month ago, I am doing worse and apologize
for stupid mistakes like,
"It you add the current costs of Iraq and other policies, for
future generations, what is the price then?"
It should of course be "If ..." .
and other policies, for
future generations, what is the price then?
Hakan
At 12:46 AM 9/25/2003, you wrote:
> >MM,
> >
> >I share the excitement of smart technical solutions with you and
> >it is interesting. The Prius that they installed the tank in, could be
> >the one
am voicing it, in the hope that maybe someone
younger than me is listening and can carry the torch of energy
sustainable conservation and sources further. Maybe that way some
suffering can be avoided.
I am probably crazy and should really give up.
Hakan
At 10:18 PM 9/24/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan
y US. Maybe we should go for "ready for use"
technologies, when we are developing next generation of solutions?
If we are in a developing country, we should maybe avoid to base
our economy on fossil fuels and energy waste?
Hakan
At 07:35 PM 9/24/2003, you wrote:
>Looks like they
be good anyway.
Hakan
At 06:02 PM 9/24/2003, you wrote:
>I've been following this thread for a while and I know that it
>originated because of real-world concerns about BD vs. hybrid
>gasoline/electric, but what about running hybrids on biofuels? How
>difficult would it be to
for oil and 14 to 28 years
for NG, before their reserves are definitely gone. It is however
not a definite stop, since the production would go down gradually.
It would however cause many severe crises.
Hakan
At 01:50 PM 9/22/2003, you wrote:
> >R/P value for US Natural gas is around 7 yea
Ken,
I have an even better solution to the economical
combustion engine and that is,
KEEP TO THE SPEED LIMITS.
I have not patented it yet, problems with financing.
It looks like all the rich people who could finance it
do not agree with the idea.
Hakan
At 01:20 PM 9/22/2003, you wrote
that the much advertised US hydrogen
economy will turn out to be a Producer gas (Gengas)
economy, based on the larges domestic coal reserves in
the world. US will never join the Kyoto agreement.
The technical discussions that we now have are more than
half a century old or 70 years.
Hakan
At 11
.
Hakan
At 02:52 AM 9/22/2003, you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Alan Petrillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Here's a question for you engineers out there.
> >
> > What limits the rev redline on diesel engines?
> >
> >
out there.
I am in process to make more info on our site, and this is an
educational introduction,
http://energy.saving.nu/solarenergy/
Hakan
At 01:15 AM 9/22/2003, you wrote:
>I see solar thermal as easier on the environment. If you want to see what
>silicon purification and fabrication
Hi Martin,
I did not think that you were that old, but yes in the beginning of the 1960's
and for nuclear power.
Hakan
At 10:53 PM 9/21/2003, you wrote:
>I'm sorry for being nostalgic, but haven't we heard about electricity
>being "too cheap to meter"?
fuel age.
If you use wood gasifier stove, you could burn the coal in a masonry
stove with hot water deposit. You could also charge the hot water
deposit from solar panel.
Interesting exercises in sustainable building, whish I could do it.
Hakan
At 12:58 PM 9/21/2003, you wrote:
>Hi Carol
the space size. You will anyway
get a base portion of useful energy for nearly nothing.
Hakan
At 12:58 PM 9/21/2003, you wrote:
>Hi Caroline
>
>
> >Then there's a
> >constant 60+ deg C heat supply from two one-cubic-metre compost piles
> >(in series),
> >
iculties in finding a positive development in the new
neo-conservative world.
If you seriously look at energy issues, can you find any real
and immediate progress in the US energy plan?
Hakan
At 02:31 AM 9/21/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan Falk wrote:
>
> >
> > I would agree with
By the way, we are tricked into a serious technical discussion here
and the only thing they want is the taxpayers money for upgrading
the grid. Since I do not pay tax in US, it does not matter for me. I
am only reacting on the way to do things.
Hakan
At 07:02 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
>I wo
is coal/nuclear at the end. It is already feverish activities in US to
build
a lot more nuclear power stations.
Hydrogen production at home? That will make Osama bin Laden happy.
Hakan
At 06:27 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
> >Initially Hydrogen will come from US coal reserves and then
>
is
all the other parts that needs grease, but even here the constant use give
larger intervals. Quality of the grease is more important than motor oil.
Modern cars is also less dependent on grease.
Hakan
At 03:41 PM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
>Martin,
>
> I believe we are in agreemen
he upgrade of the grid.
Hakan
At 08:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>Here's my two cents worth on the hydrogen economy.
>Electrolysis of water is what will happen and the car
>companies are promoting plugging into your home at
>night to charge up for the morning commute
start/stop of the burner. Now you can have a
simple thermostat-clock-bell, who tells you at a specified time if the
storage temperature is too low and that you need to fire up.
Hakan
At 01:42 AM 9/20/2003, you wrote:
>Salui Hakan!
>What I really should have said is that we have installed solar,
gallons will go a long way.
Hakan
At 05:24 PM 9/19/2003, you wrote:
>Thanks Keith,
>
>I must say I am honored to hear from you, as I have always been a silent
>admirer of your work.
>I have been amazed at what you have done, and moreso I find your site
>interesting as I used to live
Tim,
Are you surprised, they either do not want answer because they
do not know anything or they will not answer because they do.
http://energy.saving.nu/resources/scamartists.shtml
Hakan
At 06:13 PM 9/18/2003, you wrote:
>These questions are in reference to the energy crisis we are hav
Todd,
-:)) I did not belive that you would either, but I thought that it is better
to be prudent in a posting to a list.
Hakan
At 05:52 PM 9/17/2003, you wrote:
>Naw Hakan,
>
>I've seen a sausage fry with both AC & DC. Don't have any desire to cross
>terminals
Todd,
Please do not try it, to see if I am right. You can find this demo
static generators on technical museums, which produce higher
voltage at very low current, this will prove my case.
Hakan
At 03:52 PM 9/17/2003, you wrote:
>Todd,
>
>At 03:21 PM 9/17/2003, you wrote:
Todd,
At 03:21 PM 9/17/2003, you wrote:
>Hakan,
>
> > AC also give very significant security and survival advantages.
>
>Don't know what you are alluding to on that count.
One basic feature:
If you have high voltage DC, even 115/220 V and touch it, you are probably
goin
most cases are
doing application and packaging research. Apart from the distribution
advantages, AC also give very significant security and survival advantages.
Hakan
At 06:29 AM 9/17/2003, you wrote:
> > It is all about corporations, not about users.
>
>Well... If that wasn't true
. You can see effects of this in almost all important
sectors like electricity, television, mobile telephones, transportation,
fuels etc. It is all about corporations, not about users.
Hakan
At 11:26 PM 9/16/2003, you wrote:
>I wouldn't sweat the small stuff. The grid is still antiquated, as
he capacity and the body needs
to use more convection and vaporization. The body will be very warm
and uncomfortable a sunny and humid summer day, when it have
difficulties to hold the temperature balance. A cloudy and dry summer
day can be very comfortable, even with high air temperatu
the occupation. It is too late now, when US is
already committed to the cost.
Hakan
At 12:14 PM 9/16/2003, you wrote:
>One war for the price of six
> by Jonathan Weisman
>Washington Post
> Sept. 9, 2003
><http://www.unknownnews.net/030915daddywarbucks.html>http:
vapor etc.
http://energy.saving.nu/solar/images/sunabsorption.jpg
from a Swedish book we did some years ago, but things are not
changing that fast and it is still relevant.
Hakan
At 04:01 AM 9/16/2003, you wrote:
>In a message dated 9/15/2003 7:46:31 PM Central Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PRO
I wonder if we are going to see the remarkable rise in nativity that was a
result of the earlier black outs. Nothing bad that not also have some good
effects also. Peace and love. LOL
Hakan
At 04:09 AM 9/16/2003, you wrote:
>Damned if that's not the prettiest sight I've seen in
801 - 900 of 1819 matches
Mail list logo
