This may seem high, but then when I think about that forest around my
parents' property in eastern Washington, every piece of land surrounding us
has been logged at least once in the last 25 years -- many in the last 10
years. From the satellite photo of the area (about 2 meter resolution) you
c
>From: Joe Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is
>rising!C02 isrising!A scientific Rebutal
>Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:01:49 -0500
>
>This
www.wri.org can this information be found and then
verified?
--Randall
Concord, NC
- Original Message -
From: "JAMES PHELPS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is rising!C02
isrising!
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is rising!C02
isrising!A scientific Rebutal
> Well I am not sure I buy 85%. This seems a bit skewed as high. I say
> this
> because not all mans a
>From: Philip Gwinnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is rising!C02
>isrising!A scientific Rebutal
>Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:23:43 +
>
>
>Jim,
>
>The info
ow, truth is a question of presentation
Huh?
Best
Keith
>so to use his raw data to draw conclusions is not unreasonable.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Philip
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:46:26 +0900
> > To: biofue
Best Regards,
Philip
> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:46:26 +0900
> To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is rising!C02
> isrising!A scientific Rebutal
>
&
>Best Regards
>
>Philip
>Hainan Bioenergy
>
>
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
> > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:43:40 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is
>rising!C02
2007 13:43:40 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is rising!C02
> isrising!A scientific Rebutal
>
> Phillip wrote
> Snip At the same time, 85% of the world's forests (which are natural carbon
> sinks) have been destroyed or degraded.
>
> Phil
n and pulp?
Not in dispute but I would like to know how it is derived.
Jim
>From: Philip Gwinnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is
>rising!C02 isrising!A scientific Rebutal
>D
en Little Strikes Again! CO2 is rising! C02
> isrising!A scientific Rebutal
> Doing an article to rebut this CO2 nonsense. It is so easy to refute. Anyone
> ever tell you people who are for this chicken little theory that C02 causes
> global warming that heat rises. The co2 theory d
icken Little Strikes Again! CO2 is rising! C02
isrising!A scientific Rebutal
Doing an article to rebut this CO2 nonsense. It is so easy to refute. Anyone
ever tell you people who are for this chicken little theory that C02 causes
global warming that heat rises. The co2 theory defies the laws o
12 matches
Mail list logo
