Hello Michael, Rick and all
To any and all who may be interesting in my two bits.
As a relatively long time watcher of this list, it has been my
experience that the issues raised by the press releases that are sent to
this list by the super well read Keith Addison are both important to be
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 7:11 AM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
Hello Michael, Rick and all
To any and all who may be interesting in my two bits.
As a relatively long time watcher
To any and all who may be interesting in my two bits.
As a relatively long time watcher of this list, it has been my
experience that the issues raised by the press releases that are sent to
this list by the super well read Keith Addison are both important to be
published, and appealing in terms
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:03 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
The Institute of Science in Society
Science Society Sustainability
http://www.i-sis.org.uk
ISIS Press Release 11/07/05
Deconstructing
: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:03 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
The Institute of Science in Society
Science Society Sustainability
http://www.i-sis.org.uk
ISIS Press Release 11/07/05
Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
Peter Bunyard
Excellent points Hakan. Plenty of other places to discuss
nuclear. Whatever role nuclear has or doesn't have in the future,
biofuels will have a critical role in meeting our future energy needs. I
agree, natural tie ins are OK (e.g., wind power sited on biofuel fields), but
let's avoid the
a) It's not a board. It's a mailing list.
b) List rules state that calls to limit topic discussion are explicitly
forbidden. Or in the words of our fearless list owner: No Topic Cops.
c) It isn't your place to decide what the purpose of this board is.
Learn to use your delete key; if you
jh,
"Deciding" wasn't what I had in mind, nor was I trying to be a
"Cop." As parties interested in biofuels and interested in keeping
this site dynamic, I think we all exercise some self-restraint in what we post
here.My caution, along the lines of Hakan I believe, is that, as a
practical
Hello Bob, Hakan
Excellent points Hakan. Plenty of other places to discuss nuclear.
Whatever role nuclear has or doesn't have in the future, biofuels
will have a critical role in meeting our future energy needs. I
agree, natural tie ins are OK (e.g., wind power sited on biofuel
fields),
the Nuclear Power Myths
The Institute of Science in Society
Science Society Sustainability
http://www.i-sis.org.uk
ISIS Press Release 11/07/05
Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
Peter Bunyard disposes of the argument for nuclear power: it is
highly uneconomical, and the saving on greenhouse gas
of
uranium 'mining'. Does this method reduce the impact?
-Joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:03 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
] Behalf Of Keith Addison
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:03 PM
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: [Biofuel] Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
The Institute of Science in Society
Science Society Sustainability
http://www.i-sis.org.uk
ISIS Press Release 11/07/05
Deconstructing the Nuclear
The Institute of Science in Society
Science Society Sustainability
http://www.i-sis.org.uk
ISIS Press Release 11/07/05
Deconstructing the Nuclear Power Myths
Peter Bunyard disposes of the argument for nuclear power: it is
highly uneconomical, and the saving on greenhouse gas emissions
13 matches
Mail list logo
