Well I have a result for you all - but not as you would expect:
NO ACETONE
39.4l petrol used
Miles covered = 186.9
mpg = 21.35
WITH ACETONE
42.73l petrol used
Miles covered = 185.6
Mpg = 19.55
Obviously measuring over 186 miles is nowhere near sufficient in terms of
scientific
PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Keith Addison
Sent: 29 April 2005 18:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Biofuel] Fwd: Acetone as gasoline additive tests - Phase II
Any further results from Biofuel list members yet?
Regards
Keith
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL
Keith
Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Keith Addison
Sent: 29 April 2005 18:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Biofuel] Fwd: Acetone as gasoline additive tests - Phase II
Any further results from Biofuel list members yet?
Regards
In addition to mpg comparison, it will be useful to know the age and size of
the engine, the type of fuel delivery system, the fuel used, and the amount of
acetone added.
m--
Doing an mpg test at the moment ...the engine seems to be running a little
smoother, quieter with a bit more power - not
Re: BUT
I'm wondering if there were differences between tanks because of the gas. I
mean to say that there might be fluctuations in the gas delivered to the same
gas station. Since (as I understand it) the same gas station was used, perhaps
the difference is in the pumps.
...just
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Keith Addison
Sent: 30 April 2005 10:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Fwd: Acetone as gasoline additive tests - Phase II
Hi Malcolm, how goes?
Acetone's a better subject than acetylene eh? LOL! (Phew!) By the
way, we
Regards
Keith
Fwded message:
To: wastewatts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Dave Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wastewatts] Acetone as gasoline additive tests - Phase II
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last week I posted results of 3 tankfuls of gasoline containing acetone as
an additive at about
