Acetone's a better subject than acetylene eh? LOL! (Phew!) By the way, we took that tank back to that engineer, and he wasn't at all perturbed by what we told him. "Oh", he said. Hm. Beware of certain engineers bearing gifts.
Doing an mpg test at the moment Keith, another 130 miles to do before I can report back. What I will say is that the engine seems to be running a little smoother, quieter with a bit more power - not very quantitative I know.
I think nearly everyone's said that, interesting in itself, quantitative or not.
One observation I've made is that the engine before was running rich - with acetone as an additive the distinctive "sweetness" of the exhaust fumes has gone, & they smell more like that of a well tuned engine. Again not very quantitative.
What motor is that Malcolm?
Hope to have an mpg comparison next week Take care
You too, and thanks! Regards Keith
Malcolm -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Addison Sent: 29 April 2005 18:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Biofuel] Fwd: Acetone as gasoline additive tests - Phase II Any further results from Biofuel list members yet? Regards Keith
_______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable): http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
