I notice you didn't respond to this - the discussion on your claim
that the end of fossil fuels will mean the end of the fight against
world hunger (below).
You have to do some studying Greg, you've got this all wrong...
So here's a bit more for you.
Sorry about the delay, I been busy with illness and the furnace
installation.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:51
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hello Greg
: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hello Greg and all.
I disagree with some appreciation about the cost of flying because the
fuel
cost increase that you wrote As
such, the cost of flying would skyrocket.
Refering to flying
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hello Greg and all.
I disagree with some appreciation about the cost of flying because the
fuel
cost increase that you wrote As
such, the cost of flying would skyrocket.
Refering to flying in an airplane, it is possible
in the cost of flying.
- Original Message -
From: Juan Boveda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47
Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hello Greg and all.
I disagree with some appreciation about the cost of flying
but a buch of crap/junk science
[snip]
I think that I explained it a little better above.Perhaps a little
more:
In order to sequester 200 yrs of CO2, I thing that extreme measures will
have to be taken.
Fossil fuel will have to be rationed, and while ships might be able to get
away
Sorry for not getting back sooner, it's been a little hectic in the last
couple of days.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:10
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Best wishes
Keith
An important point which often gets missed is that we are adding to the
atmosphere gases of known properties: they cause the atmosphere to retain
heat.
And, if the atmosphere didn't already contain gases which retain heat,
the Earth would be very much colder than it is.
I'll snip most of this...
Couple of points: I've never heard anyone but you proposing that we
need to sequester the last 200 years of human carbon emissions.
snip
OTOH, I am sure, that there is currently a disturbing
trend, that needs to be delt with, be it short term or long term.
]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:18
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Thompson, Mark L. (PNB RD) wrote:
Sorry Mike
Actually most CO2 emissions come from Decomposing Plant material.
That is immaterial. Those emissions are essentially steady state
for is a slowed rate
increase in atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gasses.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 19:09
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Greg, the carbon released
years after the fire
has
occurred.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:18
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Thompson, Mark L. (PNB RD) wrote
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 07:29
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
In one form or another yes, but which form, and for how long?
That is a big part
An important point which often gets missed is that we are adding to the
atmosphere gases of known properties: they cause the atmosphere to retain
heat.
And, if the atmosphere didn't already contain gases which retain heat,
the Earth would be very much colder than it is.
There are many secondary
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 07:29
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
I am keeping the perspective, the carbon was around in one form or another
for that entire
, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hi Mark,
You said: Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our
civilization comes from the burning of fossil fuels, here's
, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hi Mark,
You said: Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our
civilization comes from the burning of fossil fuels
On Feb 22, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Thompson, Mark L. (PNB RD) wrote:
Sorry Mike
Actually most CO2 emissions come from Decomposing Plant material.
It is amazing what pointing out simple Off subject issues in a post
will do.
Decomposing plant material is carbon-neutral, of course, and
therefore
, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Hi Mark,
You said: Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our
civilization comes from the burning of fossil fuels, here's
.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Provost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:31
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science
Decomposing plant material is carbon-neutral, of course, and
therefore completely irrelevant
Hi Mark,
You said: Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science
...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our civilization comes
from the burning of fossil fuels, here's a little experiment you can do at home.
1.) Get yourself a chain saw and bring it with you into your bathroom
21 matches
Mail list logo
