It does pretty much work both ways...
JJJN wrote:
Ah now Mike I heard it the other way around the first time. hmm
wouldnt have anything to do with whos telling it would it? LOL
I can laugh ether way though ;^)
Mike Weaver wrote:
Joke going around political circles in DC:
What's
Hi Jim,
I was puzzled by your message. But now that I know your frame
of mind when you wrote it, I understand. I do know that I can
sound over zealous myself. You should see my friends start to yawn
when I rant on about the many sins of BushCo. They can't really
believe BushCo is that bad
Joke going around political circles in DC:
What's the definition of a Democrat?
A Republican from 1950.
D. Mindock wrote:
Hi Jim,
I was puzzled by your message. But now that I know your frame
of mind when you wrote it, I understand. I do know that I can
sound over zealous myself. You should
Hi Mike,
That begs the question:
what is the definition of today's Republican?
Here's what I found on the net: http://www.cafepress.com/notsubtle.19944829
1. Belief in large intrusive governments
2. belief in massive deficits
3. belief in foreign entanglements
4. an asshole mixed
Ah now Mike I heard it the other way around the first time. hmm
wouldnt have anything to do with whos telling it would it? LOL
I can laugh ether way though ;^)
Mike Weaver wrote:
Joke going around political circles in DC:
What's the definition of a Democrat?
A Republican from 1950.
D.
Would a Left-Right alliance mean working toward the extinction of labels (i.e. "Left" - "Right")? It's an ambiguous moving scale thatcoerces loyalty towards it's current representative ideology, irrespective of whether you agree with it.I wastold that Nixon would make a great Democrat these
Hi D..
D. Mindock wrote:
Hi Jim,
Hi D,
No not now - this should have happened after we invaded Iraq and prior
to the second four years.
Better late than never. We need to stop the Bush regime, now. It is a
loose cannon.
You are certainly right about that and I pardon the pun.
Hi Jim,
Hi D,
No not now - this should have happened after we invaded Iraq and prior
to the second four years.
Better late than never. We need to stop the Bush regime, now. It is a
loose cannon.
I honestly am not a progressive or a conservative. I simply listen to
both sides of an
Hi D,
No not now - this should have happened after we invaded Iraq and prior
to the second four years.
I honestly am not a progressive or a conservative. I simply listen to
both sides of an issue and look for the truth that comes from each then
decide where America as a people will benefit
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/10305Now Is the Time for a Left-Right AllianceA rebel alliance already
exists that could stop Bush administrationattacks on the Constitutionby
Thomas R. EddlemI'm currently a life member of the John Birch Society
and formerlyserved on the staff of the
10 matches
Mail list logo