Hakan,
I don't think that a majority were responsible for the reselection of the
current administration, but the facts show that there was severe hanky-panky
between the manufacturers of the various voting machines.
What you're about to witness is an event similar to November 1917...only
this tim
Hi
All,
Forget Iraq, take a look at what John Pilger sees happening just south of
the
border.
Regards,
Bob.
THE RISE
OF AMERICA'S NEW ENEMY
I was dropped at
Paradiso, the last middle-class area before barrio La Vega, which spills into a
ravine as if by the force of
Hear Hear!!
Ken Provost wrote:
On Nov 12, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Hakan Falk wrote:
I feel sorry for the minority of Americans, who take a stand
against what is going on. This shameful period and loss of
trust that US is going through now, will take a very long
time to repair.
Hoooray for meltdown. Bring it on!
:-) :-)
Signed, The Fairorist
Doug Foskey wrote:
Hakan,
I think you are correct. It is only a matter of time until the US reaches
(economic) meltdown. A country can only plunder resources for so long.
History shows that equilibrium will be restor
Good Lord Mike give your head a shake! How many people were screaming
that there were no WMD but it was brushed asside. Have a listen to
George Galloway's diatribe for example.
Joe
Mike Weaver wrote:
>help work on one. The Bush administration finally told us to
>stick it. Finally, the for
So what? As long as Nascar is on what's the big deal?
Freedom hater.
Zeke Yewdall wrote:
>>The US may already be reaching that meltdown. The huge and growing poor
>>population seem to attest to that.
>>
>>
>>
>
>We saw it for the first time (at least in the national media for a
>while) aft
Hello Kenji
>Doug,
>
>The US may already be reaching that meltdown. The huge and growing poor
>population seem to attest to that.
>
>Other than a mighty military industry and its spin-offs, the only
>substantial investment occuring in the US is speculative, mostly on
>foreign markets.
>
>Of cours
>
> The US may already be reaching that meltdown. The huge and growing poor
> population seem to attest to that.
>
We saw it for the first time (at least in the national media for a
while) after Katrina. The rampant social inequity that all of the
developed countries have typically done a rather
Doug,
The US may already be reaching that meltdown. The huge and growing poor
population seem to attest to that.
Other than a mighty military industry and its spin-offs, the only
substantial investment occuring in the US is speculative, mostly on
foreign markets.
Of course we are not too near t
The only problem is we'll take most of the world with us. Makes our
actions even more irresponsible.
Doug Foskey wrote:
>Hakan,
> I think you are correct. It is only a matter of time until the US reaches
>(economic) meltdown. A country can only plunder resources for so long.
>History shows t
Well, I'm upset, but I don't want to give up my SUV and my giant house.
You heard the president - it's all about US.
Besides, Europe always falls into line behind consumerism.
Not too mention, look at the rougue's gallery associated with the Oil
for Food program.
Europe loves to shriek about
Hakan,
I think you are correct. It is only a matter of time until the US reaches
(economic) meltdown. A country can only plunder resources for so long.
History shows that equilibrium will be restored eventually.
regards Doug
On Sunday 13 November 2005 7:28, Hakan Falk wrote:
> Ken,
>
> The sp
Ken,
The spot markets are in Belgium and Netherlands. For oil in
Belgium and they trade in $.
Last one who seriously tried with oil in Euro, was Saddam H.
and Iraq was invaded. LOL Do not worry, it will come anyway.
Jeans are not made in US and to boycott corporations, who
in most cases are wi
On Nov 12, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Hakan Falk wrote:
> I feel sorry for the minority of Americans, who take a stand
> against what is going on. This shameful period and loss of
> trust that US is going through now, will take a very long
> time to repair.
Excellent. Glad to hear it! So I assume this
Actually, I think the US point is incidental. Does anyone have any
proof that Hugo Chavez is guilty of anything other than being friends
with Castro?
It is well-known that Castro has a rotten civil rights record, but then
so does China and the US is happy to do business with them.
I have not
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2697
Appal Energy wrote:
>Congratulations Mike!
>
>You win the door prize for making that astute observation. :-)
>
>Truth doesn't matter. Proof doesn't matter. Only the claim matters in
>this day and age.
>
>You see sir, it's far easier to destroy something t
Chavez has said un-American things like he will sell oil and gas to poor
Americans for dirt cheap, and of course his offers of help after Katrina
were denied by the government.
Hopefully the anti-free trade movement down there will soon make its way
through the US to Canada...Hopefully Chavez wil
Mike,
Is it US in the meaning of we, or is it US administration in
the meaning of they? It seams that you are fishing for others
opinion, in order to build your own opinion.
My opinion is that I have never seen such a despicable US
administration before and they are trowing out any kind of
accu
Congratulations Mike!
You win the door prize for making that astute observation. :-)
Truth doesn't matter. Proof doesn't matter. Only the claim matters in
this day and age.
You see sir, it's far easier to destroy something than it is to
construct it or maintain it and you can get more mileage
That wasn't the question. The question was whether or not any of the
claims were true. You are raising a different point.
Chris lloyd wrote:
>>Has the US come up with any proof that Chavez is actually guilty of
>>anything they are accusing him off? <
>>
>>
>
>I did not think proof of gui
You are conflating two different things. My question was, and is, is
there any proof of the claims the US is making?
Your point is a different one.
Appal Energy wrote:
>You forget Young Master Weaver. The US doesn't believe it needs proof of
>anything before acting.
>
>Todd Swearingen
>
>
>
The US has made some pretty serious claims - I was wondering if anyone
had actually seen or read anything that would prove them.
It sounds to me a lot like Castro, because he is rotten on human rights,
therefore he also guilty of X, XX and XXX.
Hakan Falk wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I think that it migh
Mike,
I think that it might be the accusation of that
he is selling some of the US oil in the
Venezuelan earth to China. US think that it is
already enough that China is using the US oil in
Chinese territory, already that proves that China is too energy demanding.
Now Canada made some deals
> Has the US come up with any proof that Chavez is actually guilty of
> anything they are accusing him off? <
I did not think proof of guilt was a requirement before action is taken
these days. If whatever you are doing (or not doing) is not in Bush's
interest you are targeted. Even the UK got
You forget Young Master Weaver. The US doesn't believe it needs proof of
anything before acting.
Todd Swearingen
>Has the US come up with any proof that Chavez is actually guilty of
>anything they are accusing him off?
>
>Keith Addison wrote:
>
>
>
>>"While the world looks to Iran and Syria
Has the US come up with any proof that Chavez is actually guilty of
anything they are accusing him off?
Keith Addison wrote:
>"While the world looks to Iran and Syria for the next Bush attack,
>Venezuelans know they may well be next. On 17 March, the Washington
>Post reported that Feliz Rodr
"While the world looks to Iran and Syria for the next Bush attack,
Venezuelans know they may well be next. On 17 March, the Washington
Post reported that Feliz Rodrguez, "a former CIA operative
well-connected to the Bush family" had taken part in the planning of
the assassination of the Presi
27 matches
Mail list logo
