Hi Chip
>Keith Addison wrote:
> > Hello Robert
> >
> >> Keith Addison wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Robert
> >>>
>
>Really excellent stuff snipped,
Thankyou, for my part, glad you think so.
>I just wanted to make an apparently obvious
>observation that I've come to over my short
>half-a-century;
>
>"T
Keith Addison wrote:
> Hello Robert
>
>> Keith Addison wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Robert
>>>
Really excellent stuff snipped,
I just wanted to make an apparently obvious
observation that I've come to over my short
half-a-century;
"There is no us and them,
There is only us, and we're all we have,
quod e
Keith Addison wrote:
(living "over the line.")
I know. It happened to me when I was 23 and a little blue-eyed boy in
the eyes of my family and so on because of my stellar progress up the
rungs of the journalism career ladder, but then I went and altogether
blew it by chucking aside a great
Hi Frank
>Hi Robert and Keith,
>
>"I know. It happened to me when I was 23 "
>
>It happened to me, too. I think "it" is exiting the allegorical
>cave, seeing the truth and not turning away from it. It then
>becomes a burden and a responsibility to uphold, but ultimately, the
>only thing that
Hi Robert and Keith,
"I know. It happened to me when I was 23 "
It happened to me, too. I think "it" is exiting the allegorical cave,
seeing the truth and not turning away from it. It then becomes a burden and
a responsibility to uphold, but ultimately, the *only *thing that matters.
"So the
Hello Robert
>Keith Addison wrote:
>
>>Hello Robert
>>
>>I didn't reply to this because I was a bit taken aback. Anyway I'll
>>try. Lots of snips.
>>
>>Good for you with your attempt to complain to Feinstein, but why
>>work in a vacuum?
>
> It's a little isolating to live "over the line."
I k
Keith Addison wrote:
Hello Robert
I didn't reply to this because I was a bit taken aback. Anyway I'll
try. Lots of snips.
Good for you with your attempt to complain to Feinstein, but why work
in a vacuum?
It's a little isolating to live "over the line." My social network
is pri
Hello Robert
I didn't reply to this because I was a bit taken aback. Anyway I'll
try. Lots of snips.
Good for you with your attempt to complain to Feinstein, but why work
in a vacuum?
>>A lot of folks enjoyed those Oz videos about "Stupid Americans" but I
>>thought they were very depressing! N
up
support for another war and they are more than willing to do so.
PAUL E. LEHMANN
Brunswick
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Truth or Propaganda?
http://www.zmag.org/conte
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?itemid=12139
ZNet |Iran |
IED Lies
by Milan Rai
February 16, 2007
The US claims that Iran supplies Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDS)
to Iraqi insurgents. No serious evidence has been provided.
SUMMARY
On Sunday 11 February, anonymous US officials
Or, it could well be tue. Iran's current rulers are no bunch of
schoolgirls on a picnic - just ask any Bahai.
Of course, now no one believes anything Bush says - which is own fault.
Woolf!
Jason& Katie wrote:
>oh, PLEASE! a few plumbing bits, some assorted cleaning chemicals, and a
>lead sl
oh, PLEASE! a few plumbing bits, some assorted cleaning chemicals, and a
lead slug could level a truck easily. this is assuming that nobody touched
any weapons stash, and everyone was dealing with what they had on hand. why
would the Iraqi rebels need Iran's help blowing stuff up? more lies, as
Keith Addison wrote:
Be more than deeply suspicious!
There doesn't seem to be a whole lot I can do about this. The
president isn't listening. I phoned Senator Feinstein's office and
spoke to a rather laconic staffer about my concerns, telling him that I
do not support the administra
Wolf. Wooolf! Woollff!
Keith Addison wrote:
>http://www.alternet.org/stories/47994/
>
>Fool Us Twice? From Iraq to Iran
>
>By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted February 14, 2007.
>
>Hyped claims of nuclear weapons with no evidence to back it up ...
>Why does that sound familiar?
>
>It's déja
http://www.alternet.org/stories/47994/
Fool Us Twice? From Iraq to Iran
By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted February 14, 2007.
Hyped claims of nuclear weapons with no evidence to back it up ...
Why does that sound familiar?
It's déja vu. This time the Bush gang wants war with Iran. Following
a
Hi Robert
>Keith Addison wrote:
>
>>Fool you twice, Robert? It's the same BS as last time.
>
>Well, I wasn't fooled the first time and I'm deeply suspicious now!
Be more than deeply suspicious!
>This is a VERY unpopular stance to hold among the people with whom I
>generally associate--espec
Keith Addison wrote:
Fool you twice, Robert? It's the same BS as last time.
Well, I wasn't fooled the first time and I'm deeply suspicious now!
This is a VERY unpopular stance to hold among the people with whom I
generally associate--especially family members.
I guess Larisa Ale
Keith Addison wrote:
>Hotlinked xrefs in the online version.
>
>-
>
>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17036.htm
>New York Times Falls for Bogus Iran Weapons Charges
>
>Completely Implausible Numbers are Thrown Around - Repeat of Judy
>Miller Scandal
>
>By Juan Cole
>
>
Thank
Fool you twice, Robert? It's the same BS as last time.
>... Yet I'm hearing more and more stories on the radio that
>implicate Iran for all manner of woes in the region, and yesterday,
>I listened to the following on NPR:
>
>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7371750
I guess L
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/article2261526.ece
Independent Online Edition > World Politics
Target Tehran: Washington sets stage for a new confrontation
By Patrick Cockburn
Published: 12 February 2007
The United States is moving closer to war with Iran by accusing the
"highest l
Hotlinked xrefs in the online version.
-
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17036.htm
New York Times Falls for Bogus Iran Weapons Charges
Completely Implausible Numbers are Thrown Around - Repeat of Judy
Miller Scandal
By Juan Cole
02/12/07 "
ICH" -- -- This NYT article depen
I've been reading a lot of discussion on this list lately concerning a
build-up of military forces in the Persian Gulf, ostensibly in prelude
to an attack against Iran. Projecting power from afar requires the
United States to build forces, but we don't ALWAYS attack a nation just
because we've
22 matches
Mail list logo
