In september till december a few big climate 
negotiations ~ meetings are comming up,
also one to make a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol.

Here under the view of the head of the UN 
Framework Convention on Climate change.

It looks like the thirth world gonna have to do the major changes.  :-(


Grts
Bruno M.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070823/ap_on_sc/netherlands_climate_change&printer=1;_ylt=Akug4Y3ealioHriHK1FWWl9xieAA

De Boer speaks on climate change treaty

By ARTHUR MAX, Associated Press WriterThu Aug 23, 4:45 PM ET

The treaty that replaces the Kyoto Protocol on 
climate change could be a potpourri of legal 
obligations, nonbinding commitments and aid 
arrangements for the developing world, but each 
nation should choose its own course, the U.N.'s 
top climate official said Thursday.

At the outset of a season of climate 
negotiations, Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. 
Framework Convention on Climate Change, said 
countries like the United States are mistaken if 
they dismiss the Kyoto process on the grounds it 
is forcing them into unwanted legal commitments.

"Countries themselves are in the best position to 
decide how they can achieve a target to which 
they commit," he told The Associated Press from 
his headquarters in Bonn, Germany. "You should 
not seek to impose legally binding commitments on countries."

At the same time, he said, it was up to the 
industrialized nations to take the lead in 
fighting global warming, and that binding 
commitments give a strong signal to energy 
investors on where to put their money.

De Boer's comments appeared aimed at minimizing 
differences with the United States, which opted 
out of binding international agreements, but 
which is now trying to seize the initiative in 
shaping the next phase of world climate policy.

The U.S. position has angered the European Union, 
which has adopted increasingly higher targets and 
imposed tough regulations on its member nations beyond their Kyoto commitments.

President Bush has called a conference in 
Washington next month of the world's 15 biggest 
polluters, including India, China and several 
other countries that were not bound by the 1997 
Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. De Boer will head the U.N. delegation.

That meeting will take place three days after a 
broader meeting on climate change summoned by 
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Sept. 24 in 
New York. Both the Washington and New York talks 
are geared toward a major U.N. meeting in Bali, 
Indonesia, in December to discuss a successor agreement to Kyoto.

The Kyoto agreement requires 35 industrial 
nations to cut their global-warming emissions 5 
percent below 1990 levels by 2012. It also 
devised a carbon trading market and set up a 
system for nations to offset part of their 
obligations by sponsoring emission-reduction 
projects in developing countries. De Boer said 
700 such projects ­ such as financing 
hydroelectric or wind power projects ­ are in the pipeline.

Bush has criticized Kyoto partly because it 
excluded fast-developing countries that have 
become big polluters, and frequently singled out India and China.

However, De Boer said both those countries have 
adopted voluntary commitments: India to produce 
25 percent of its energy from renewable supplies 
by 2030, and China to increase its energy 
efficiency by 20 percent within five years.

Those kinds of commitments could dovetail with 
legally binding commitments in any new agreement, 
along with any number of other ideas.

Voluntary and binding targets "are two 
approaches. Who knows? The process we launch in 
Bali might lead to three, four or five different 
approaches that accommodate different countries, 
different capabilities, to act on climate. It 
doesn't need to be one size fits all," he said.

De Boer said an important element in the 
post-Kyoto climate regime will be how countries 
can gain credit by helping the developing world.

"It makes sense to get the biggest bang for your 
bucks, to identify the most cost-effective 
emissions reduction options around the world. The 
atmosphere doesn't care where you reduce 
emissions as long as you reduce emissions," he said.

"Having said that, there is a responsibility ... 
for industrialized countries to take the lead 
through domestic emissions reductions," he said.

While legally binding targets cannot be imposed 
on unwilling nations, they are "important for the credibility of the process."

Also Thursday, the U.N. released a report that 
additional investments of around $210 billion a 
year will be needed to hold greenhouse gas 
emissions to the current level in 2030, and most 
of that investment should flow to the developing 
world. Those countries will need tens of billions 
of dollars more annually to help them adapt to 
unavoidable changes in their climate, it said.


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to