Jim,
Let's review:
You said: "A Corporation is only a form of a business along with Limited Liability partnerships, a dozen or so hybrid forms and Sole proprietors ships any one is only as good as those that lead it. What is your solution? where do you stop? Ban all forms of trade?"
I don't
The Philosopher King
Mike Redler wrote:
Jim,
Let's review:
You said: A Corporation is only a form of a business along with Limited
Liability partnerships, a dozen or so hybrid forms and Sole proprietors ships
any one is only as good as those that lead it. What is your solution? where do
you
True. But, I'm not sure I see your point Jim.
Mike
JJJN wrote:
I am not sure of this but in the beginning didn't the Constitution
require that the Government was to be funded by buisness and trade? And
did not the victory tax come to be our first income tax?
Jim
Mike Weaver wrote:
Jim,
Your statement puts all forms of business into one category (i.e. IBM
with the village baker) and redirects the discussion toward all forms of
trade. This is a direction that I won't be led into.
The point I made directly addresses the wealth and power accumulated as
human labor becomes
I suppose it has to do with the original thread ,
4) All Funding for the expenses of government to come from Business and
Corporation only. (this means it would be unlawfully to tax the populace) as a
reply to Mike Weaver and D
No point really other that this was a part of our constitution.
Mike,
Mike Redler wrote:
Jim,
Your statement puts all forms of business into one category (i.e. IBM
with the village baker) and redirects the discussion toward all forms of
trade. This is a direction that I won't be led into.
No it does not, that happens in your mind, but it does put
I was refering the era of the robber barons. The Octopus, Frank
Norris, and that whole era.
I personally don't mind maying taxes, particularly as the schools in my
area are good, the cops are honest, the city picks the trash and we
mandate 20% biodiesel in all heavy equipment. I feel I get
Mike,
A Corporation is only a form of a business along with Limited Liability
partnerships, a dozen or so hybrid forms and Sole proprietors ships any
one is only as good as those that lead it. What is your solution? where
do you stop? Ban all forms of trade? I don't like the greed and abuse
I am not sure of this but in the beginning didn't the Constitution
require that the Government was to be funded by buisness and trade? And
did not the victory tax come to be our first income tax?
Jim
Mike Weaver wrote:
We've been through similar periods before...railroads, steel, Standard
We've been through similar periods before...railroads, steel, Standard
oil, Airlines...
Michael Redler wrote:
Jim wrote: I really don't mind corporations, and I like to see them
make a profit when it means prosperity for all.
*Divided World: Rich Live Longer, Poor Die Younger*
Robber baron era anyone?
JJJN wrote:
I really don't mind corporations, and I like to see them make a profit
when it means prosperity for all, I just dont like the powers in
Govrnment to be persuaded and corrupted by those profits. Yes this one
needs some work,
Thanks
Jim
D. Mindock wrote:
Hi Jim,
I think number 4 could be dangerous. What if a corporation wanted to
withhold their taxes for some
reason?
I'd modify number 5:
5) Government through representation of the people by the people.
to this:
5) Government through representation of only the people, by only the people,
for
D. Mindock wrote:
Hi Jim,
I think number 4 could be dangerous. What if a corporation wanted to
withhold their taxes for some
reason?
I'd modify number 5:
5) Government through representation of the people by the people.
to this:
5) Government through representation of only the
D. Mindock wrote:
Hi Jim,
I think number 4 could be dangerous. What if a corporation wanted to
withhold their taxes for some
reason?
I'd modify number 5:
5) Government through representation of the people by the people.
to this:
5) Government through representation of only the
I really don't mind corporations, and I like to see them make a profit
when it means prosperity for all, I just dont like the powers in
Govrnment to be persuaded and corrupted by those profits. Yes this one
needs some work,
Thanks
Jim
D. Mindock wrote:
Hi Jim,
I think number 4 could be
Jim wrote: "I really don't mind corporations, and I like to see them make a profit when it means prosperity for all."Divided World: Rich Live Longer, Poor Die Youngerhttp://www.commondreams.org/headlines/062900-01.htmThose who want wealth, will have it. Since there is no individual who's work
16 matches
Mail list logo
