We tend to make a lot of fuss over acrolein fumes from burning glyc,
apparently with good reason, but the IARC says the same about
acrolein, also Group 3:
Evaluation
There is inadequate evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of acrolein.
There is inadequate evidence in experimental
Three quick points and then I have to get back to work.
First, although acrolein and saccharin may both Group 3 compounds
according to IARC, you yourself pointed out that the *reasons* for which
they recieved that label are very very different.
Logically, saying we don't have enough
To each his own poison, eh? :-)
Keith.
Three quick points and then I have to get back to work.
First, although acrolein and saccharin may both Group 3 compounds
according to IARC, you yourself pointed out that the *reasons* for
which they recieved that label are very very different.
Dear Eagle,
I was not advocating the use of the little pink
packets that contain saccahrin which indeed is a
carcinogenic. Splenda comes in yellow packets. As far
a reading about food products on the internet I'll
trust the Center for Science in the Public Interest,
before I'll listen to
Complete earful on the benefits (not) of cow's milk.
http://www.notmilk.com
Luc
- Original Message -
From: Martin K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic
Phillip Wolfe wrote:
Thanks Bob
Phillip Wolfe wrote:
Thanks Bob, (Professor Allen),
My adopted family from Honduras would only drink raw
organic milk, goats milk and believe it not even
donkey's milk! They are very healthy individuals.
They do not like store bought milk but that is about
the only choice we have nowadays.
all ; )
Over the last six months I have come to realize that the major reason
why autistic children need to avoid milk is because it is pasteurized.
The pasteurization process
http://www.mercola.com/2003/mar/26/pasteurized_milk.htm turns casein
into a very dangerous molecule that can
ratbags.com
quackwatch.com
Legal Eagle wrote:
G'day Phillip/Kirk;
Stevia, even if 100% natural, has also had some negative reports come
out about it, however I am not in a position to call that one. As for
the artificial sweeteners, there are not sufficient words that
adequately describe
G'day Ken;
Before suggesting that others follow you into the lovely carcinogenic
world of methanol producing artificial sweeteners. Methanol in the
system is cumulative
no it is not. It is metabolized into formaldehyde and formic acid
rather quickly. Toxic in high concentrations but
Thanks Bob, (Professor Allen),
My adopted family from Honduras would only drink raw
organic milk, goats milk and believe it not even
donkey's milk! They are very healthy individuals.
They do not like store bought milk but that is about
the only choice we have nowadays.
By the way, I know of
Obviously you have never read Pottengers Cats by
Frances Pottenger MD
or
Nutrition and Physical Degeneration by Weston Price.
I have seen Quackwatch and it is typical of those
who set themselves up as keepers of the one true
faith. They attempt to sweep all dissidents into the
same trash can by
Dear Kirk, Thanks for the info. I read the complete
text. My WWII veteran father is slight diabetic and I
will definitely research and forward to my sistes for
review for our father. Here an academic report I found
on the internet:
http://ari.calstate.edu/FundedProjects/abstract-Production.htm
Phillip,
Before you jump on the bandwagon you might want to
read this http://www.cspinet.org/new/stevia.html
I alway like how these news releases pretend that they
are on the crux of a new discovery. Stevia has been
available in health food stores for years, and in some
full service
concerned abou such things.
Luc
- Original Message -
From: Phillip Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic
Dear Kirk, Thanks for the info. I read the complete
text. My WWII veteran father
then that is your choice, but to say that it is
good is erroneous at best.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Splenda/sucralose toxic
Phillip,
Before you jump on the bandwagon you might
Dear Eagle,
I was not advocating the use of the little pink
packets that contain saccahrin which indeed is a
carcinogenic. Splenda comes in yellow packets. As far
a reading about food products on the internet I'll
trust the Center for Science in the Public Interest,
before I'll listen to someone
16 matches
Mail list logo
