Blind date with disaster
We are constantly warned by scientists that our planet is in big  
trouble, so why can't we change direction? David Suzuki, one of the  
world's leading ecologists, on how humans have lost the vital skill  
of foresight
David Suzuki
The Guardian, Wednesday March 12 2008
Article history
About this article
Close
This article appeared in the Guardian on Wednesday March 12 2008 on  
p9 of the Society news & features section. It was last updated at  
09:46 on March 12 2008.


Birthplace of humanity: flamingos still crowd the lakes of the Rift  
Valley but the naked apes have taken a different path. Photo: Alamy

As I approach my 72nd birthday, I have reluctantly achieved the  
position of elder, and it is mindboggling to reflect on the changes  
that have occurred in my lifetime. The population of the world has  
tripled, while technology has exploded from early radio, telephones  
and propeller planes to the telecommunication revolution, computers,  
space travel, genetic engineering and oral contraceptives. And stuff!  
My biggest challenge is to staunch the flow of stuff into my life.  
But these great successes - economic growth, technology, consumer  
goods - have come at enormous cost: the degradation of our very life  
support systems - air, water, soil, energy and biodiversity.

We are now the most numerous species of mammal on Earth and each of  
the 6.6 billion of us must breathe, drink, eat, be clothed and find  
shelter. So the mere act of living means our species has a heavy  
collective ecological footprint. When that is amplified by technology  
(computers, TV, cars, etc) used on our behalf, our hyperconsumption  
and the global economy, we have been transformed into a force that is  
now altering the biological, chemical and physical features of the  
planet on a geological scale.

Experts estimate that more than 50,000 species now become extinct  
annually. More than half the planet's forests are gone, and if we  
continue to destroy them as we are doing there will be no large  
intact forests left within two decades. We cannot escape the toxic  
debris of our industrial activity. Recently, three members of  
parliament in Ottawa were tested for more than 80 toxic chemicals and  
were shocked to learn that all three carried dozens.

The oceans are being depleted. A global study led by biologist Boris  
Worm, of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, predicts that  
if habitat destruction and overfishing continue, every exploited  
marine species will be commercially extinct by 2048. And for 20  
years, climatologists have warned us that human activity is altering  
the chemical composition of the atmosphere, with consequent climate  
change occurring at unprecedented speed.

I could go on listing the depressing litany of problems, but the need  
to take serious action on all of these issues is converging, and we  
must make major decisions to change course.

How did we arrive at this moment? As a biologist, I tend to view  
things from an evolutionary perspective. DNA studies reveal that we  
emerged as a species in Africa some 150,000 years ago - a mere blink  
in geological time. The world was a very different place back then.  
There were still woolly mammoths roaming the Earth, sabre-toothed  
tigers, giant sloths in North America and 3-metre tall moa birds.

Spectacular trajectory

Let's suppose scientists have discovered time travel, so we take a  
time machine and hover above the Rift Valley in east Africa 150,000  
years ago. The plains are a spectacular sight, covered with immense  
herds of mammals; vast flocks of birds fill the air; rivers and lakes  
teem with fish and reptiles. The clusters of furless, upright apes  
who are our ancestors are not that impressive. Those early humans are  
not numerous, large, strong or fast, or endowed with special sensory  
abilities. There is little to indicate the spectacular trajectory  
this naked ape is about to follow.

But if we watch them for a while, we can recognise their special  
secret: their behaviour reveals that they are intelligent. The human  
brain endowed us with a massive memory, insatiable curiosity,  
inventiveness, and an ability to think in abstracts. These qualities  
more than compensated for our lack of physical and sensory abilities.  
That brain created a notion of a future, even though the only reality  
is the present and our memories of the past. And because that brain  
invented a future, we recognised that we could affect that future by  
what we do in the present. If we look ahead, we can see where  
opportunities and dangers lie, and by following a deliberate path we  
can avoid the hazards, while exploiting the opportunities. Foresight,  
I believe, was one of the most important abilities that enabled us to  
survive and flourish, and continues to underlie our explosive success  
as a species.

Today, we have all the amplified foresight conferred by scientists,  
computers, engineers and telecommunications, and for more than 40  
years, leading scientists have been looking ahead and warning us that  
humanity is heading along a dangerous and unsustainable path, while  
there are benefits and opportunities in moving along a different  
direction. For example, in 1992, a remarkable document called World  
Scientists' Warning to Humanity was signed by more than 1,500 senior  
scientists, including more than half of all Nobel prizewinners alive  
at that time.

Here is some of what the document said: "Human beings and the natural  
world are on a collision course. Human activities inflict harsh and  
often irreversible damage on the environment and critical resources.  
If not checked, many of our current practices put at serious risk the  
future we wish for human society . . . and may so alter the living  
world that it will be unable to sustain life in the manner that we  
know. Fundamental changes are urgent if we are to avoid the collision  
our present course will bring about."

The document goes on to list the critical areas of the atmosphere,  
water resources, oceans, soil, forests, species extinction, and  
overpopulation. Then the words grow even more urgent: "No more than  
one or a few decades remain before the chance to avert the threats we  
now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity immeasurably  
diminished. . .

A great change in our stewardship of the Earth and life on it is  
required if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on  
this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated."

This is a frightening document; eminent scientists do not often sign  
such a strongly worded missive. But if the Scientists' Warning is  
frightening, the response of the media in North America was  
terrifying - there was no response. None of the major television  
networks bothered to report it, and both the New York Times and  
Washington Post dismissed it as "not newsworthy". And even today,  
when we have been told we could have as little as 10 years to avoid  
catastrophe, that is considered not worth reporting, while every  
antic of Paris Hilton or Britney Spears is reported in breathless  
detail, not for days or weeks but for months and years.

Instead we hear excuses to ignore the warnings: it will ruin the  
economy; technology will solve the problem; it is not fair when other  
countries are not included; there are other priorities demanding  
immediate attention, etc. And so we turn our backs on the very  
strategy that got us to where we are.

Business as usual

For decades, scientists in the US had pointed out that New Orleans  
was a disaster waiting to happen. The city lies in an area that is  
prone to annual hurricanes, half the city is below sea level, and a  
force 5 hurricane was bound to hit the city, so drastic measures had  
to be implemented immediately to avoid disaster. All the while,  
politicians and businesspeople countered that it would be  
economically ruinous to take precautionary action, and carried on  
with business as usual - no doubt crossing their fingers that nothing  
would happen during their tenure. We all know what did happen when  
Hurricane Katrina hit the city in 2005 and confirmed all the  
predictions scientists had made.

The need to look ahead and manoeuvre to exploit opportunities and  
avoid threats continues to be just as critical in modern society. The  
challenge is to find why we are rejecting foresight, why we can't see  
what the real threats are that confront us.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080318/eba7d7b6/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: flamingoes_276.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 42451 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20080318/eba7d7b6/attachment.jpg 
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to