Just for consideration.
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/894mnyyl.aspGreg H.
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at
Just for consideration.
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/894mnyyl.asp
Greg H.
The critics share three fundamental premises. The first is that
Japan's situation in 1945 was catastrophically hopeless. The second
is that Japan's leaders recognized that fact and
Well Keith,
Your doubt as to what is and isn't close to Mr. Kristol's heart, or Mr.
Murdoch's, hasn't been shaken.
The article is an effort to dissassemble critical dissent of the
traditionalist American view of whether or not Hiroshima and Nagasaki
were a necessary means to the end of war
Hi Todd
Well Keith,
Your doubt as to what is and isn't close to Mr. Kristol's heart, or
Mr. Murdoch's, hasn't been shaken.
:-) Do they have hearts?
The article is an effort to dissassemble critical dissent of the
traditionalist American view of whether or not Hiroshima and
Nagasaki were
that everyone would have been allot happier had Japan surrendered
unconditionally allot sooner.
Greg H.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 11:08
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fw: [HDR] August 06, 2005
