http://search.japantimes.co.jp/mail/nb20110426n2.html

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Solar-panel producers stand to benefit from nuke fears

By MARIKO YASU and MAKI SHIRAKI

Bloomberg

Akiko Hirai says the Hamaoka power station 3 km from her home evokes 
such dread of the crippled Fukushima plant that she would spend 
¥500,000 installing solar panels if it helped make Japan nuclear-free.

"Who can really guarantee that they're 100 percent safe? I want 
nuclear plants to be halted if they're so frail," said the 
53-year-old housewife, who has lived in Shizuoka Prefecture for more 
than 20 years. "It's not that I'm worried about myself, it's my 
daughter and other small children I'm concerned about."

Hirai helps illustrate Japan's growing antinuclear movement in the 
wake of the world's biggest nuclear accident since Chernobyl. That's 
creating an opportunity for makers of solar equipment such as 
Panasonic Corp. and Sharp Corp. to capitalize on orders that analysts 
estimate may exceed $100 billion over the next decade, bringing down 
costs for consumers.

"It's become clear we can't keep relying on nuclear power or fossil 
fuels," said Koji Toda, chief fund manager at Resona Bank Ltd. in 
Tokyo. "Still, solar power is too expensive for the market to bloom 
without subsidies. It's easy to agree on the big picture but not so 
easy to determine who pays the price."

Toshiba Corp. and Hitachi Ltd., Japan's two largest makers of nuclear 
reactors, have underperformed Japan's Topix index, while shares of 
Panasonic and Sharp have outperformed the benchmark since last 
month's natural disaster.

Last June, Japan laid out plans to build nine atomic reactors by 2020 
and at least five more the following decade to increase the nation's 
portion of nuclear energy to 50 percent of overall power generation 
by 2030 from 29 percent in 2009. Prime Minister Naoto Kan said March 
31 the country needs to revise those policies.

That means Japan will probably step up a campaign to encourage the 
use of solar cells for years at the expense of atomic power, Takashi 
Watanabe, a Tokyo-based analyst at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., wrote in 
an April 1 report. Solar may be the strongest option because of 
restrictions on where wind and thermoelectric power stations can be 
built, he said.

Replacing the proposed nuclear plants with solar ones would require 
108 gigawatts of photovoltaic generation by 2020, according to 
Goldman Sachs. Based on the current estimated costs of solar cells, 
that capacity would cost more than $150 billion.

Solar-panel prices will likely fall to $1.50 per watt in the second 
half of 2011 from about $1.80 in 2010, Jenny Chase, a solar analyst 
for Bloomberg New Energy Finance, said March 29.

Panasonic and Sharp, Japan's biggest maker of solar panels, would 
benefit from increased domestic adoption of the technology as the 
companies earn about half of their solar-panel revenue from Japan, 
Watanabe said. The strength of their brands and relations with home 
builders would also help the Japanese companies against Chinese solar 
companies, he said.

"Interest in solar power and other alternative energy sources will 
probably rise further," said Akihiko Oiwa, a spokesman for Sanyo 
Electric Co., Panasonic's solar-panel unit. "Although they're 
unlikely to replace nuclear energy right away, solar and other 
alternative energies will likely supplement existing power 
facilities."

Politicians may help. Gov. Yuji Kuroiwa held a 90-cm solar panel on 
the streets of Kanagawa Prefecture this month as he pledged to 
install solar panels to support as many as 2 million households. 
Kanagawa will "kick off the revolution" to end Japan's dependency on 
nuclear power, Kuroiwa said April 11, the day after the former 
journalist drew twice as many votes as his opponent in the election.

On the same day in Shizuoka Prefecture, Gov. Heita Kawakatsu said he 
aims to make Shizuoka the top municipality in terms of the rate of 
solar-panel use. Kawakatsu plans to reduce Shizuoka's reliance on 
nuclear energy from 80 percent by providing subsidies for consumers 
and funding research that could improve the efficiency of 
photovoltaic power.

"I've never felt such insecurity before," said Tamako Sato, a 
69-year-old housewife who lives in Kashiwazaki, Niigata Prefecture, 
where the world's biggest nuclear plant is located. "I want the plant 
to be out of the town."

Reactors at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant have 
been halted since an earthquake hit the plant in 2007 and caused 
radiation to leak.

Japan isn't alone in reviewing its nuclear plans since the March 11 
earthquake and tsunami knocked out cooling equipment at Tepco's 
Fukushima No. 1 power plant, leading to the evacuation of hundreds of 
thousands of inhabitants.

The U.S. started a 90-day review of domestic nuclear safety last 
month. German Chancellor Angela Merkel on March 15 ordered the idling 
of the country's seven oldest reactors pending safety checks. Italy 
extended a moratorium April 20 for its nuclear projects indefinitely.

China, the world's biggest energy consumer, will cut its 2020 target 
for nuclear power capacity and build more solar farms following 
Japan's atomic crisis, an official at the National Development and 
Reform Commission said last month.

Germany may increase its annual solar installation target to 5 
gigawatts from the current 3.5 gigawatts, according to estimates at 
research firm IHS ISuppli. Japan's accident may also lead to a review 
of Italy's plan to cut incentives for solar-panel buyers from June, 
the researcher said.

For Toshiba, Japan's biggest maker of nuclear reactors, atomic energy 
still has the edge over other power sources.

"Even if we hypothetically say an accident occurs once in every 30 
years and that we need to consider the cost for radiation leak 
problems, we're also left with an issue of reducing carbon dioxide," 
Toshiba President Norio Sasaki said this month. "Nuclear power will 
remain as a strong option."

Hitachi President Hiroaki Nakanishi said April 6 residents' concerns 
won't derail Japan's plans to seek more nuclear power. "It surely has 
become harder to get the backing of residents to build a nuclear 
plant," Nakanishi said. "It's not possible for Japan to totally 
eliminate the usage of nuclear power."

_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to