robert,

there is a lot of myth swirling around this issue.  the sanctions did result 
in severe hardships for the people of iraq.  however, once the oil for food 
program got under way, things really started to turn around.  by the time 
'shock 
and awe' started, the UN-administered program had kicked serious butt on 
hunger and malnutrition, as well as a whole series of health/welfare indices 
like 
various illnesses, the water and education infrastructures, etc.  Baghdad was 
beginning to prosper once again, as well.

now, as far as s. h.'s spending priorities during the first few years of 
sanctions, i expect a serious case could be made against him.  however, it is 
incumbent on whomsoever should wish to condemn him to provide an accurate and 
thorough accounting of his government's actual spending during that time 
period, 
and demonstrate that the cost of preventing the hunger, malnutrition, illness, 
etc., as well as rebuilding his country, would not have exceeded his 
government's means.  for if it were beyond his government's means, then the 
u.s.a. 
would indeed be to blame.

more realistically, though, the u.s.a. bears some blame because it would be 
almost self-evident to anyone involved in the process, that health and welfare 
spending would be among the first things to get cut.

not to mention, does anyone else see the irony here?  after all, there is a 
lot of inequity, hunger and malnutrition in the united states, and we don't 
even have sanctions to blame it on. . . .

-chris b.

In a message dated 8/8/05 10:31:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<That said, I have a question that perhaps someone out there can address,  
re: 
<<"Dysentery, starvation (due to ten years of sanctions) and war in  Iraq.", 
<specifically concerning the sanctions.  Whatever the US role  in those 
<sanctions, it has always seemed to me that Saddam Hussein had the  resources 
to <address 
<the basic health/sanitation needs of his people but instead  chose to spend 
<it on a lavish lifestyle for himself, his family, and supporters,  and on 
other 
<nonessentials compared to basic needs.  Yet, almost  without exception, the 
<US gets blamed for this humanitarian disaster during the  sanctions.  Why? >>


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to