Hi Murdoch,
It is interesting and I like to write about or publish from somebody,
a piece that in a correct way mirrors the result of the past policies
and how the oil was paid.
At 08:49 PM 12/31/2002 -0800, you wrote:
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:15:21 +0100, you wrote:
I wrote the following for
Hi Murdoch,
Sorry, I screwed up who says what, resending it.
It is interesting and I like to write about or publish from somebody,
a piece that in a correct way mirrors the result of the past policies
and how the oil was paid.
At 08:49 PM 12/31/2002 -0800, murdoch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002
I wrote the following for publication at Energy Saving Now, please look,
comment, correct and suggest a good heading, I took the heading for this
discussion as a temporary one and maybe it is the best. I would also be
happy if Keith could look at the language.
Perspective on Oil Dependencies
Sounds good to me
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com; biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Cc: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: [biofuels-biz] Re: [biofuel] OT: Perspective on US Oil Dependencies
I wrote
Looks good.
James Slayden
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:
I wrote the following for publication at Energy Saving Now, please
look,
comment, correct and suggest a good heading, I took the heading for this
discussion as a temporary one and maybe it is the best. I would also be
Looks good.
James Slayden
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Hakan Falk wrote:
I wrote the following for publication at Energy Saving Now, please
look,
comment, correct and suggest a good heading, I took the heading for this
discussion as a temporary one and maybe it is the best. I would also be
