Re: Re: Re: [Biofuel] Noble gesture by Bush

2004-10-17 Thread jerrrobb

Jefferson, now and again, was a very wise man.  I believe George Washington 
also echoed those sentiments about foreign entanglements.
For those who would like a better summary than I can give of the anti-Bush 
logic, there is an Adobe Acrobat chapter online by George Soros (the 
billionaire) called The Iraqi Quagmire.   It is available for downloading at 
http://www.georgesoros.com
The actual download is at:  http://www.georgesoros.com/soros_chapter_four.pdf

I particularly like the part on page 58 about the (remember, this is chapter 
four, so it's not page 58 of the download).  Anyway, it reflects the statement 
I made below about Bush restating Kerry's logic.  Bush took a chance relying 
on the WMD argument, hoping, I guess, that we would indeed find WMD in Iraq, 
or, more likely, if the invasion was a success, no one would care to question 
the logic.  What he underestimated was the amount of resources it would take to 
mount an occupation.  

About the pro-Israel (Zionist) lobby.  A lot of born-again Christians in the 
U.S. support Bush, and also Israel, mistakingly thinking that, since 
Christianity was born in Judiasm, that they should therefore support Israel and 
some of them even look forward to the Apocalypse.Page 53 of Soro's 
chapter four makes an interesting comment: Since the apocalypse involves the 
destruction if Israel, Israel might be better off without friends like this.  

There were Jews in Palestine long before Israel came about in 1948.   They were 
scattered among the Arabs for centuries, and there were conflicts between 
different peoples for centuries.  The Crusades came about because the Ottoman 
Empire (I think this is right) invaded Europe, and this was Europe's response.  
 Also, Britain, in particular, was worried about Russia and used this Arab area 
as a sort of buffer.

The Islamic religion was born from Judiasm and Christianity, even as 
Christianity was born from Judiasm.   No one can change what has happened down 
through the centuries, and there have been a lot of wrongs on all sides.
More hating and fighting isn't going to solve anything, but that is exactly 
human nature seems to be about.   

The U.S. is caught in the middle, ostensibly because of its lust for oil.  
But what would these countries do if suddenly the U.S. found another source of 
energy and announced that it didn't really need to import the oil?

What if we dropped Israel altogether and left it to fend for itself?

Would these Islamic extremists be satisfied.  Or would they still want to 
exterminate us?

What is their real agenda?  





On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Senator Kerry's speech in Congress
 of Oct. 9, 2002, in which Kerry said, I believe the record of Saddam
 Hussein's ruthless, reckless breach of international values and
 standards of behavioris cause enough for the world community to
 hold him accountable by use of force, if necessary...

After he had outlived his usefulness in making war on Iran, murdering the
local Communists, suppressing the Kurds, etc.

Saddam must be feeling the force of the Earl of Strafford's exhortation,
as he was about to have his head chopped off for outliving his usefulness
to Charles I: Put not your trust in princes.

Rumsfeld, Reagan and company were probably as guilty of the crime  under
the Nuremburg principles, of waging aggressive war on Iran in the 80's,
as Bush, Rumsfeld and company are for waging aggressive war on Iraq.

But, then, Nuremburg was for losers.

Anyone who reads the Federalist Papers, the writings of Thomas Jefferson,
etc,; will be aware that one reason that the U.S. Founding Fathers wished
to avoid foreign entanglements and foreign wars, was that they thought
that a constitutional republic could not not long exist in a state
devoted to self-aggrandizement by war (except against the Indians).

They were wise.

As Jefferson put it, I tremble for my country, when I reflect that
God is just.

Doug Woodard
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
---
Email sent using Grand River Mutual's Web E-mail (http://www.grm.net)


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: Re: Re: [Biofuel] Noble gesture by Bush

2004-10-17 Thread Legal Eagle
 into the blood-drenched ditches of yet another Zionist atrocity.


When the USS Liberty was attacked, who did it? Israel.
When Lybia was attacked who set it up to look as if they had something to do 
with the niteclub bombing ? Israel's Mossad and a false flag op.

Who's official moto is By Way of Deception Thou Shalt do War ?
Israel's Mossad. Do the deed but be sure you leave a fresh passport behind 
so eveyone will know who to point the finger at.
Just like Judas Iscariot was called a disciple but turned out to be a 
traitor, so too are these called Christian but deny the very faith they 
claim to live by.Traitors,each and every one. Jesus said, why call ye me 
Lord Lord and DO NOT the things that I ask? like love God and each other, 
which He said were the only two comandments that were necessary? Is that 
what these so-called christians are doing when they support oil grabs and 
the slaughter of innocent babies in sovereign lands?
There were no WMD's, there is no connection between Saddam and Al Queda, 
there is no connection between Saddam and 9-11, so all of these amount to 
what Bush et company of Zionist neocons have done are wars crimes, the 
Congressional authority not being in force when he lied to the world and 
invaded Iraq. So not only are the so-called christian-zionists hypocrites 
and traitors to their faith but they are also suporting international 
crimes. The UN has declared the Iraq war illegal. The Congressioanl 
authority was conditional on the aforementioned events which did not and do 
not exits, so even under US law the war is ... illegal. Crimes, all of it 
and these so-called christians support it all blindly leading the blind and 
falling into whatever ditch they care to drag the world into.

There is such a thing as righteous indignation and tis is mine.

Luc

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Biofuel] Noble gesture by Bush


Jefferson, now and again, was a very wise man.  I believe George 
Washington also echoed those sentiments about foreign entanglements.
For those who would like a better summary than I can give of the 
anti-Bush logic, there is an Adobe Acrobat chapter online by George 
Soros (the billionaire) called The Iraqi Quagmire.   It is available for 
downloading at

http://www.georgesoros.com
The actual download is at: 
http://www.georgesoros.com/soros_chapter_four.pdf


I particularly like the part on page 58 about the (remember, this is 
chapter four, so it's not page 58 of the download).  Anyway, it reflects 
the statement I made below about Bush restating Kerry's logic.  Bush 
took a chance relying on the WMD argument, hoping, I guess, that we would 
indeed find WMD in Iraq, or, more likely, if the invasion was a success, 
no one would care to question the logic.  What he underestimated was the 
amount of resources it would take to mount an occupation.


About the pro-Israel (Zionist) lobby.  A lot of born-again Christians in 
the U.S. support Bush, and also Israel, mistakingly thinking that, since 
Christianity was born in Judiasm, that they should therefore support 
Israel and some of them even look forward to the Apocalypse.Page 53 
of Soro's chapter four makes an interesting comment: Since the apocalypse 
involves the destruction if Israel, Israel might be better off without 
friends like this.


There were Jews in Palestine long before Israel came about in 1948.   They 
were scattered among the Arabs for centuries, and there were conflicts 
between different peoples for centuries.  The Crusades came about because 
the Ottoman Empire (I think this is right) invaded Europe, and this was 
Europe's response.   Also, Britain, in particular, was worried about 
Russia and used this Arab area as a sort of buffer.


The Islamic religion was born from Judiasm and Christianity, even as 
Christianity was born from Judiasm.   No one can change what has happened 
down through the centuries, and there have been a lot of wrongs on all 
sides.More hating and fighting isn't going to solve anything, but that 
is exactly human nature seems to be about.


The U.S. is caught in the middle, ostensibly because of its lust for 
oil.  But what would these countries do if suddenly the U.S. found another 
source of energy and announced that it didn't really need to import the 
oil?


What if we dropped Israel altogether and left it to fend for itself?

Would these Islamic extremists be satisfied.  Or would they still want to 
exterminate us?


What is their real agenda?



___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

---
Email sent using Grand River Mutual's Web E-mail (http://www.grm.net

Re: Re: [Biofuel] Noble gesture by Bush

2004-10-15 Thread jerrrobb

Actually, I think Bush must have gotten the idea as to how to explain the 
reason that it was still the right thing to have gone to war in Iraq, even 
though no WMD have been found, from Senator Kerry's speech in Congress of Oct. 
9, 2002, in which Kerry said, I believe the record of Saddam Hussein's 
ruthless, reckless breach of international values and standards of 
behavioris cause enough for the world community to hold him accountable by 
use of force, if necessary... (Complete speech can be found in the 
Congressional Record)
And to bring democracy to Iraq, of course.   Bush simplified the words a lot:
Bad guy, good war, bring good democracy to Iraqis.
Or something like that.
No wonder Bush snickers every time Kerry says he was tricked into voting to 
authorize the use of force.





Hello All ;

Congressman Ron Paul, in Ron Pauls' Freedom Report,
March 2004 :

Since no weapons of mass destruction or link to al
Qaeda have been found in Iraq, the explanation given
now for having gone there was top bring democracy to
the Iraqi people.  Yet now we hear that the Iraqis are
demanding immediate free elections not controlled by
the United States and our administration says the
Iraqi people are not yet ready for free elections. 
THE TRUTH IS THAT A NATIONAL ELECTION IN IRAQ WOULD
BRING INDIVIDUALS TO POWER THAT THE ADMINISTRATION
DOESN'T WANT. Democratic elections will have to wait.

Cheers.


 
--- Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I guess Bush has to inflate the numbers, because
 3,000
 is a small number compared to the other atrocities
 that have occurred.
 
 Already there are about 12,000 Iraqi civilians
 killed
 20,000 died in Bhopal, neither Union Carbide nor Dow
 which bought Union Carbide has paid one penny in
 reparation.
 1 million died in the Rawanda massacre
 who knows how may are dying in Dakar
 40,000 are slaughtered each year on American
 highways
 half by drunk drivers
 10 million African babies die each year from
 starvation
 1 million Armenians were massacared by the Turks
 Hitler exterminated 10 million
 Stalin killed about 20 million
 And the land of liberty and freedom, now committed
 to
 granting democracy to others, completely decimated
 its native population in its formative years, 
 
 Done with my soap box ranting
 Ken
 
 
 
 
 
 --- Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Following some of the election speeches by Bush,
 he
  is talking by the 
  3,800+ Americans that died at WTC. If I am not
  completely misinformed, 
  about half of them were foreign nationals
  originally, but they must have 
  been adopted by presidential decree or some other
  mechanism. A very nice 
  gesture, but the problem I have, were they asked
  before they became 
  Americans? I heard that if you are born on
 American
  soil, you are 
  automatically American or have the right to be, I
  did not know that it was 
  the same case if you died on American soil.
  
  Hakan 
  
  
 
 
 
  
 ___
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
 http://vote.yahoo.com
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
---
Email sent using Grand River Mutual's Web E-mail (http://www.grm.net)


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: Re: [Biofuel] Noble gesture by Bush

2004-10-15 Thread btmd

Let's see, October 9, 2002.  That would be when the phony intelligence
still said that we would find WMD?  Sure, nothing has changed in the two
years since then, so you can still use that to explain anything, right?

Bush--Stands firmly by what he believes, no matter how wrong he is proven
to be.

Brian

Actually, I think Bush must have gotten the idea as to how to explain the
 reason that it was still the right thing to have gone to war in Iraq,
 even though no WMD have been found, from Senator Kerry's speech in
 Congress of Oct. 9, 2002, in which Kerry said, I believe the record of
 Saddam Hussein's ruthless, reckless breach of international values and
 standards of behavioris cause enough for the world community to hold
 him accountable by use of force, if necessary... (Complete speech can be
 found in the Congressional Record)
 And to bring democracy to Iraq, of course.   Bush simplified the words a
 lot:
 Bad guy, good war, bring good democracy to Iraqis.
 Or something like that.
 No wonder Bush snickers every time Kerry says he was tricked into voting
 to authorize the use of force.





 Hello All ;

Congressman Ron Paul, in Ron Pauls' Freedom Report,
March 2004 :

Since no weapons of mass destruction or link to al
Qaeda have been found in Iraq, the explanation given
now for having gone there was top bring democracy to
the Iraqi people.  Yet now we hear that the Iraqis are
demanding immediate free elections not controlled by
the United States and our administration says the
Iraqi people are not yet ready for free elections.
THE TRUTH IS THAT A NATIONAL ELECTION IN IRAQ WOULD
BRING INDIVIDUALS TO POWER THAT THE ADMINISTRATION
DOESN'T WANT. Democratic elections will have to wait.

Cheers.



--- Ken Riznyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I guess Bush has to inflate the numbers, because
 3,000
 is a small number compared to the other atrocities
 that have occurred.

 Already there are about 12,000 Iraqi civilians
 killed
 20,000 died in Bhopal, neither Union Carbide nor Dow
 which bought Union Carbide has paid one penny in
 reparation.
 1 million died in the Rawanda massacre
 who knows how may are dying in Dakar
 40,000 are slaughtered each year on American
 highways
 half by drunk drivers
 10 million African babies die each year from
 starvation
 1 million Armenians were massacared by the Turks
 Hitler exterminated 10 million
 Stalin killed about 20 million
 And the land of liberty and freedom, now committed
 to
 granting democracy to others, completely decimated
 its native population in its formative years,

 Done with my soap box ranting
 Ken





 --- Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Following some of the election speeches by Bush,
 he
  is talking by the
  3,800+ Americans that died at WTC. If I am not
  completely misinformed,
  about half of them were foreign nationals
  originally, but they must have
  been adopted by presidential decree or some other
  mechanism. A very nice
  gesture, but the problem I have, were they asked
  before they became
  Americans? I heard that if you are born on
 American
  soil, you are
  automatically American or have the right to be, I
  did not know that it was
  the same case if you died on American soil.
 
  Hakan
 
 




 ___
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
 http://vote.yahoo.com
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
 ---
 Email sent using Grand River Mutual's Web E-mail (http://www.grm.net)


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
 http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/


___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: Re: [Biofuel] Noble gesture by Bush

2004-10-15 Thread dwoodard


On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Senator Kerry's speech in Congress
 of Oct. 9, 2002, in which Kerry said, I believe the record of Saddam
 Hussein's ruthless, reckless breach of international values and
 standards of behavioris cause enough for the world community to
 hold him accountable by use of force, if necessary...

After he had outlived his usefulness in making war on Iran, murdering the
local Communists, suppressing the Kurds, etc.

Saddam must be feeling the force of the Earl of Strafford's exhortation,
as he was about to have his head chopped off for outliving his usefulness
to Charles I: Put not your trust in princes.

Rumsfeld, Reagan and company were probably as guilty of the crime  under
the Nuremburg principles, of waging aggressive war on Iran in the 80's,
as Bush, Rumsfeld and company are for waging aggressive war on Iraq.

But, then, Nuremburg was for losers.

Anyone who reads the Federalist Papers, the writings of Thomas Jefferson,
etc,; will be aware that one reason that the U.S. Founding Fathers wished
to avoid foreign entanglements and foreign wars, was that they thought
that a constitutional republic could not not long exist in a state
devoted to self-aggrandizement by war (except against the Indians).

They were wise.

As Jefferson put it, I tremble for my country, when I reflect that
God is just.

Doug Woodard
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/