On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) <
yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Yup!
> -Ngie
>
>
Given no objections from emaste@ (seems unlikely, given the content), can
one of you please commit this when able?
It seems like a good idea for the sake of providing context fo
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 12:33, Kyle Evans wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)
> wrote:
>
> As a general rule of thumb, if it doesn’t pass, it needs to be marked
> as an expected failure until it passes. Not really a big deal right now
> (because ci.free
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) <
yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As a general rule of thumb, if it doesn’t pass, it needs to be
> marked as an expected failure until it passes. Not really a big deal right
> now (because ci.freebsd.org isn’t spamming current@ —
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 11:41, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> Author: emaste
> Date: Wed Apr 5 18:41:44 2017
> New Revision: 316536
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/316536
>
> Log:
> bsdgrep: create additional tests for coverage on recent fixes
>
> Create additional tests to cover regress
Author: emaste
Date: Wed Apr 5 18:41:44 2017
New Revision: 316536
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/316536
Log:
bsdgrep: create additional tests for coverage on recent fixes
Create additional tests to cover regressions that were discovered by
PRs linked to reviews D10098, D1
