On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:17 -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
In article20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org
Nathan Whitehornnwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes:
Log:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:17 -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
In article20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:03:40AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:10AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
Or both? We're heading in the direction of having both for the FTP
server tree.
Kinda gross but
On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
Kinda gross but FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso?
Can't we use one if they are equal?
I'd prefer consistency. [...]
But it looks so plain stupid!
I've had someone ask me what amd64-amd64 meant when I pointed them as the RC
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:34 +, David Chisnall wrote:
On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
Kinda gross but FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso?
Can't we use one if they are equal?
I'd prefer consistency. [...]
But it looks so plain stupid!
I've had
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
This is the problem we are trying to solve:
Supported TARGET/TARGET_ARCH pairs for world and kernel targets
amd64/amd64
arm/arm
arm/armeb
i386/i386
ia64/ia64
mips/mipsel
mips/mipseb
mips/mips64el
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
This is the problem we are trying to solve:
Supported TARGET/TARGET_ARCH pairs for world and kernel targets
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
This is the problem we are trying to solve:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:43:12PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:44:52AM -0500, Ken Smith
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:16 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:11:36 am Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:57 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:16:47PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
If you're referring to the FTP directory tree layout we wind up with:
.../releases/amd64/9.0-RELEASE
.../releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.0
for an example of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/11 10:00 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:16:47PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:12 pm Ken Smith wrote:
If you're referring to the FTP directory tree layout we wind up
with:
In article 20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org
Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes:
Log:
Further automate production release generation by naming files the right
things and generating checksums.
Modified: head/release/generate-release.sh
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:17 -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
In article20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org
Nathan Whitehornnwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes:
Log:
Further automate production release generation by naming files the right
On 11/16/11 08:28, TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro wrote:
In article20151849.pafinr3k012...@svn.freebsd.org
Nathan Whitehornnwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes:
Log:
Further automate production release generation by naming files the right
things and generating checksums.
Modified:
In article 1321457050.78238.10.ca...@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu
Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu writes:
+: ${RELSTRING=`chroot $2 uname -s`-`chroot $2 uname -r`-`chroot $2 uname
-p`}
Should this be 'uname -m' rather than 'uname -p'?
There isn't a good option here when there is only one tag --
17 matches
Mail list logo
