On 16 Jun 2014, at 22:13, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi Mark,
I just adopted the comments to the code change. So here is the improved patch:
Index: cpufunc.c
===
--- cpufunc.c (revision 267575)
+++ cpufunc.c
Hi Michael,
If that works, then Brilliant! :-) :-)
Could you please fix this so the _PMC_USER_READ_WRITE_ is all in one place
(it’s too dangerous to split up), and put an architecture-specific #ifdef
around just the MCR instruction we care about.
With that, its good to commit, I’d say. I’ll
On 17 Jun 2014, at 20:33, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
If that works, then Brilliant! :-) :-)
Could you please fix this so the _PMC_USER_READ_WRITE_ is all in one place
(it’s too dangerous to split up), and put an architecture-specific #ifdef
around just the MCR
On 17 Jun 2014, at 19:58, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
So you want something like:
Yup! Looks good! :-)
If you want to blame me for reviewing this, thats fine, but I’ve not run it
(I’m waiting for a replacement RPI, still).
Please don’t be offended if a follow-up commit of mine
On 17 Jun 2014, at 21:05, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 17 Jun 2014, at 19:58, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
So you want something like:
Yup! Looks good! :-)
If you want to blame me for reviewing this, thats fine, but I’ve not run it
(I’m waiting for a
On 15 Jun 2014, at 17:13, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 30 May 2014, at 09:42, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 21:21, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 19:27, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29 May
On 16 Jun 2014, at 08:28, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
your patch for accessing the value is correct. However, the initialisation
code also
needs to be adopted to the platform. So in addition to your patch, you also
need:
Thanks!
Is there an easy test to see if the code
On 16 Jun 2014, at 19:36, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Jun 2014, at 08:28, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
your patch for accessing the value is correct. However, the initialisation
code also
needs to be adopted to the platform. So in addition to your patch, you
On 16 Jun 2014, at 20:25, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should print a whole lotta numbers, incrementing, unless you hit the
wraparound.
Don't I need to compile a kernel with _PMC_USER_READ_WRITE_ being defined,
since
without it a user process can't access the register. When
On 16 Jun 2014, at 21:29, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Jun 2014, at 20:25, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should print a whole lotta numbers, incrementing, unless you hit the
wraparound.
Don't I need to compile a kernel with _PMC_USER_READ_WRITE_ being defined,
On 16 Jun 2014, at 20:38, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hmm, the documentation reads
Which docs are you using?
I’m using DDI0360F. (And that could easily be a wrong choice).
M
--
Mark R V Murray
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
On 16 Jun 2014, at 22:13, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Jun 2014, at 20:38, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hmm, the documentation reads
Which docs are you using?
I’m using DDI0360F. (And that could easily be a wrong choice).
That is what I'm also looking at.
On 16 Jun 2014, at 22:41, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Jun 2014, at 22:13, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16 Jun 2014, at 20:38, Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hmm, the documentation reads
Which docs are you using?
I’m using DDI0360F. (And
On 30 May 2014, at 09:42, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 21:21, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 19:27, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 20:15, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29
On 15 Jun 2014, at 17:13, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 30 May 2014, at 09:42, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 21:21, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 19:27, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29
On 29 May 2014, at 21:21, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 19:27, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 20:15, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 19:13, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
I can
On 05/22/14 09:09, Mark R V Murray wrote:
On 21 May 2014, at 21:15, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 05/14/14 21:11, Mark Murray wrote:
Author: markm
Date: Wed May 14 19:11:15 2014
New Revision: 266083
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266083
Log:
Give
On 29 May 2014, at 12:05, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 05/22/14 09:09, Mark R V Murray wrote:
On 21 May 2014, at 21:15, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 05/14/14 21:11, Mark Murray wrote:
Author: markm
Date: Wed May 14 19:11:15 2014
New Revision: 266083
On 29 May 2014, at 19:41, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 12:05, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 05/22/14 09:09, Mark R V Murray wrote:
On 21 May 2014, at 21:15, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 05/14/14 21:11, Mark Murray
On 29 May 2014, at 19:13, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
I can make it work on RPI, but trying to find what else it will/won’t work
on is more problematic.
Wouldn't it require to use different registers on the RPI? This would mean you
would need more #ifdefs…
Thats the
On 29 May 2014, at 20:15, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 19:13, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
I can make it work on RPI, but trying to find what else it will/won’t work
on is more problematic.
Wouldn't it require to use different registers on
On 29 May 2014, at 19:27, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 20:15, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 19:13, Michael Tuexen tue...@fh-muenster.de wrote:
I can make it work on RPI, but trying to find what else it will/won’t work
on
On 22 May 2014, at 09:09, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 21 May 2014, at 21:15, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 05/14/14 21:11, Mark Murray wrote:
Author: markm
Date: Wed May 14 19:11:15 2014
New Revision: 266083
URL:
On Sat, 24 May 2014 21:09:56 +0200
Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 May 2014, at 09:09, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 21 May 2014, at 21:15, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
On 05/14/14 21:11, Mark Murray wrote:
Author: markm
Date: Wed May
On 24 May 2014, at 23:02, Andrew Turner and...@fubar.geek.nz wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014 21:09:56 +0200
Michael Tuexen tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 May 2014, at 09:09, Mark R V Murray ma...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 21 May 2014, at 21:15, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org
wrote:
On
On 21 May 2014, at 21:15, Hans Petter Selasky h...@selasky.org wrote:
On 05/14/14 21:11, Mark Murray wrote:
Author: markm
Date: Wed May 14 19:11:15 2014
New Revision: 266083
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266083
Log:
Give suitably-endowed ARMs a register similar to the
On 05/14/14 21:11, Mark Murray wrote:
Author: markm
Date: Wed May 14 19:11:15 2014
New Revision: 266083
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266083
Log:
Give suitably-endowed ARMs a register similar to the x86 TSC register.
Hi,
Regression issue:
This commit prevents RPI-B from
Author: markm
Date: Wed May 14 19:11:15 2014
New Revision: 266083
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266083
Log:
Give suitably-endowed ARMs a register similar to the x86 TSC register.
Here, suitably endowed means that the System Control Coprocessor
(#15) has Performance
28 matches
Mail list logo
