subject:"svn commit\: r364292 \- in head\: lib\/libc\/tests\/sys lib\/libfetch lib\/libpam\/libpam lib\/msun\/tests libexec\/rtld\-elf usr.bin\/fetch usr.bin\/unzip"

Re: svn commit: r364292 - in head: lib/libc/tests/sys lib/libfetch lib/libpam/libpam lib/msun/tests libexec/rtld-elf usr.bin/fetch usr.bin/unzip

2020-08-17 Thread Xin Li

On 8/17/20 01:22, Mark Millard wrote: > For the c99's that were removed: why were they not > gnu99's originally? If there is a reason, why is > it now okay to revert to gnu99 instead of sticking > with c99? gnu99 was made default in 2009, most of these "c99" cases predates that and should be

Re: svn commit: r364292 - in head: lib/libc/tests/sys lib/libfetch lib/libpam/libpam lib/msun/tests libexec/rtld-elf usr.bin/fetch usr.bin/unzip

2020-08-17 Thread Mark Millard via svn-src-head

> Author: delphij > Date: Mon Aug 17 05:57:02 2020 > New Revision: 364292 > URL: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364292 > > > Log: > Don't explicitly specify c99 or gnu99 as the default is now gnu99. > > . . . > > Modified: head/lib/libc/tests/sys/Makefile >

svn commit: r364292 - in head: lib/libc/tests/sys lib/libfetch lib/libpam/libpam lib/msun/tests libexec/rtld-elf usr.bin/fetch usr.bin/unzip

2020-08-16 Thread Xin LI

Author: delphij Date: Mon Aug 17 05:57:02 2020 New Revision: 364292 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364292 Log: Don't explicitly specify c99 or gnu99 as the default is now gnu99. MFC after:2 weeks Modified: head/lib/libc/tests/sys/Makefile head/lib/libfetch/Makefile