Re: [Swan-dev] Strongswan version bump [was Re: Sahana's RSA-PSS code merged in - upgrade strongswan to 5.6.3]
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 09:53, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > > | From: Andrew Cagney > > | (to upgrade the domains use 'make kvm-upgrade' or 'make kvm-purge > | kvm-upgrade-base-domain') > > Darn. > > I kicked of a test last night with only "make kvm-purge". So I guess > I still get the old version of Strongswan. kvm-purge leaves the basement (aka the base domain) untouched. It's trying to follow the path of least surprise - without an explicit directive it won't modify the basement contents. (there's kvm-demolish which also deletes the base domain, however it undermines other domains, hmm wonder what builders call removing everything but the basement, minor renovation?) ___ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
Re: [Swan-dev] Strongswan version bump [was Re: Sahana's RSA-PSS code merged in - upgrade strongswan to 5.6.3]
| From: Andrew Cagney | (to upgrade the domains use 'make kvm-upgrade' or 'make kvm-purge | kvm-upgrade-base-domain') Darn. I kicked of a test last night with only "make kvm-purge". So I guess I still get the old version of Strongswan. I thought kvm-purge was as hard as you could hit it. ___ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
Re: [Swan-dev] Strongswan version bump [was Re: Sahana's RSA-PSS code merged in - upgrade strongswan to 5.6.3]
On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 at 13:16, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: > > | From: Paul Wouters > > | This means that if you don't upgrade the guests to this, the strongswan > | tests will fail in swan-prep since it refuses to run the test (to avoid > | people pingponging output when they have different strongswan versions) > | > | For fedora-22 I've made the rpm available at: > > I'm sure you mean F22 guests. Currently this is what gets used by our > testing system if one doesn't do anything to change it. > > | https://ftp.nohats.ca/strongswan/strongswan-5.6.3-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm > > Thanks. > > | For f28, it should come with that version automatically. > > I didn't think that we actually support f28 guests with HEAD. Right. It's been tested intermittently, and results have definitely improved (look for *-f28 on testing). It's also hardwired to use the same RPM as F22 so our results don't flip flop. Thanks for fixing the KVM configuration. (to upgrade the domains use 'make kvm-upgrade' or 'make kvm-purge kvm-upgrade-base-domain') > > > Each of these references should probably be fixed > > $ git grep -ni 'strongswan.*\.rpm' > testing/docker/Dockerfile-f22:57:RUN wget > ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/ssw/strongswan-debuginfo-5.3.2-1.0.lsw.fc22.x86_64.rpm > testing/docker/Dockerfile-f22:58:RUN wget > ftp://ftp.nohats.ca/ssw/strongswan-debuginfo-5.3.2-1.0.lsw.fc22.x86_64.rpm > testing/docker/Dockerfile-f22:59:#RUN rpm -i > strongswan-debuginfo-5.3.1-0.2.lsw.fc22.x86_64.rpm > testing/libvirt/fedora22.mk:12:KVM_STRONGSWAN_PACKAGE ?= > https://download.nohats.ca/strongswan/strongswan-5.6.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm > testing/libvirt/fedora28.mk:10:KVM_STRONGSWAN_PACKAGE ?= > https://download.nohats.ca/strongswan/strongswan-5.6.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm > > I've taken the liberty of changing the last two. Untested! > ___ > Swan-dev mailing list > Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org > https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev ___ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
