Re: [SWCollect] Best voice acting in a game

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

C.E. Forman wrote:
 
 My all-time personal favorite?  This is gonna sound strange, but... Whoever
 did the voice clip of Professor Elvin Atombender at the start of Epyx's
 Impossible Mission for the C64: Stay awhile... Staaayyy FOREVE!
 Freaking awesome, even today.

You'll kick yourself:  That's 100% speech synthesis.  You should give
homage to the programmer that tweaked the phonemes and inflection.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] This could get ugly

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

C.E. Forman wrote:
 
 I dunno, it could be a freak incident.  leemanblue seems to be a total
 newbie, 1 feedback, about 86 bids on this one item, indicating he has no
 concept of subtlety or sniping.  I've seen other newbies bid insane prices

Sniping is a good thing?  I'm going to turn that into another thread.

 Of course, you could always e-mail the winner and ask him to break the
 shrinkwrap and copy it for you, then continue to bring it up periodically
 even after he's made it abundantly clear he doesn't want to.  (Hee, teasin'!
 B-)

I have never done this.  Hopefully you're just recounting personal
experience and not confusing me with Underdogs ;-)
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




[SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

I abhor sniping.  Not because of what it is or what it does, but how
people react to it, both good and bad.  

Proxy bidding is a joy to behold:  You bid once, with your maximum, and
ebay/whatever will automatically up the bid until you hit your maximum. 
If someone outbids you at the last second, no problem -- you wouldn't
have paid more than your maximum anyway.  This is how I bid 99% of the
time.  I see something I want, think good and hard about the *absolute
maximum* I'd pay for something, and then I bid that maximum amount.  I
don't give it a second thought; in fact, I don't even have ebay email me
if I've been outbid.

Based on this operating philosophy, I just simply cannot comprehend
sniping.  Some people perform sniping on this list -- even *enjoy* it. 
To those people, I ask you the following questions:

1. Why do you snipe when you can just enter in a maximum and walk away?

2. If you lose a bid due to someone else sniping you, do you get
angry/frustrated?

PS:  This is an honest curious question -- I'm not mad that someone
out-sniped me or anything.  The goal of these questions is not to talk
badly about sniping, but to try to understand why it exists when proxy
bidding makes it unnecessary.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Bad seller?

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

 Dan Chisarick wrote:
 
 Communication stopped over a month ago.  I've sent a steady
 stacatto of e-mail messages into /dev/null it seems.  While I never
 had to use it, I think eBay offers some manner of fraud protection.  A
 quick look shows a $25 deductable.  The four items exceed $25, but
 each individual item is well under that.  Paypal won't help once the
 money has been withdrawn by the receiver (I think).  So, pretty much
 looks like I'm eating this one.
 Any advice, or at least some stories about getting blindsided or
 totally stiffed?

This is exactly what's happened to me -- Guy has $35 of my money and
hasn't shipped yet.  I should've read his feedback before I bid, because
there is some hint of that behavior previously.  I'll send him another
message.
 
 PS - Total irony here... the e-mail address for this person is
 @atcc.com.  If you go to http://www.atcc.com, its a religious site.
 When I sent an e-mail message there, I got an autoresponder from a
 bishop's e-mail (or that's what it said).  Who would think of getting
 the shaft from one of the cloth?

Like that's never happened before at all?  Hint #1:  Since when do
religious sites end in .com?
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Bad seller?

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

Dan Chisarick wrote:
 
 The seller claims to have suffered a tragic loss (2 deaths in her
 family).  It was 2 months ago.  Obviously anyone would sound like a total
 jerk trying to argue that she had enough time to mourn but she's swinging
 it like a hammer everytime someone dares to complain about her.  Sigh.

It is my personal experience that this is used as the ultimate excuse
more frequently than it is used legitimately.  In other words, it's been
2 months -- she's over it, or she was lying.  Complain again.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Worlds of Ultima/Martian Dreams

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

Alexander Zöller wrote:
 
 As for that bidder you've been watching, he was willing to pay $1500 for the
 Akalabeth cover art, and more than $300 for the FM Towns versions of U4 and
 the Ultima Trilogy. $300 for each, that is.

FM Towns?
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Worlds of Ultima/Martian Dreams

2001-08-28 Thread AvatarTom

In a message dated 08/28/2001 2:00:46 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 FM Towns? 

Japanese computer/gaming system.

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Stephen S. Lee


On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
[snip]
 1. Why do you snipe when you can just enter in a maximum and walk away?

* If you bid early, and you bid primarily on game software, bidding early
  says loud and clear, look!  cool stuff!  (I actually find some of the
  stuff I get by searching for certain early-bidders.  It's actually a
  good way of finding things.)

* If you have only so much money to spend, and want multiple items, you're
  better off waiting as long as you can.  For example, you have $100 to
  spend; there are 10 games that you want; on each, you're willing to pay
  as much as $20.  You can't bid $20 on all of them right away, as you
  could be driven above your limit.  It's better to wait on these as long
  as you can, and see how the first auctions go before you decide what to
  do with the later ones.

* Bidding early has a tendency to get you into a bidding war with newbies
  (who have a tendency to pay too much).  If you don't tip your hand you
  minimize this risk from those people with low ratings who are willing to
  pay WAY over value.

* Bidding early puts you at risk of ye olde bid-and-retract trick.
  eBay has moved to reduce the viability of this trick, but it's still
  something to keep in mind.

-- Stephen


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread AvatarTom

In a message dated 08/28/2001 2:00:44 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 PS:  This is an honest curious question -- I'm not mad that someone
 out-sniped me or anything.  The goal of these questions is not to talk
 badly about sniping, but to try to understand why it exists when proxy
 bidding makes it unnecessary. 

For one it is exciting and makes it possible to get a bargain. If you have 
your max bid in someone can come along and test it (I've seen people drive 
up a person's bid to the max for fun) 

Tom

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread AvatarTom

In a message dated 08/28/2001 2:00:44 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 2. If you lose a bid due to someone else sniping you, do you get
 angry/frustrated? 

Oh yes I can by the way, especially if it happens quite a few times by the 
same person with a fast connect, one guy always gets in in the last 1-2 secs.

Tom

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Also it prevents shilling (sp)?

THIS is the first valid reason I've seen *for* sniping.  However, it
works both ways -- if someone is going to employ a shill, won't the
shill just bid the minimum amount the seller wants for the item as his
maximum bid?  Just a thought.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread AvatarTom

In a message dated 08/28/2001 2:39:22 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 THIS is the first valid reason I've seen *for* sniping.  However, it
 works both ways -- if someone is going to employ a shill, won't the
 shill just bid the minimum amount the seller wants for the item as his
 maximum bid?  Just a thought. 

Nah, they would just use a reserve I would guess. If they shill they can do 
the testing thing to drive the bid that was made up to the max.

Tom

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread AvatarTom

In a message dated 08/28/2001 2:36:52 PM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  * If you bid early, and you bid primarily on game software, bidding early
says loud and clear, look!  cool stuff!  (I actually find some of the
stuff I get by searching for certain early-bidders.  It's actually a
good way of finding things.)
 
 Why is this an issue?  Is it because you draw attention to yourself? 
 If so, why is that a bad thing?
   

This is valid also, say you find a lot of games that has a treasure in it 
(maybe you emailed the seller for some specifics on an item you thought might 
be a good one). If you bid early there are people who check what you are 
bidding on and this alerts them to something they probably would have never 
found. It happens!!!

Tom

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




[SWCollect] Where is Pedro?

2001-08-28 Thread AvatarTom

Haven't seen you in awhile Pedro?

Tom

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

Alexander Zoller wrote:
 
 Why do you snipe when you can just enter in a maximum and walk away?
 
 Because placing my maximum bid days before the auction ends may result
 in newbie bidders nibbling away at my bid, thus driving up the price.
 Bidding at the last possible moment ensures that nobody gets a chance
 to react to my bid.

Hm.  This is a legitimate reason -- but in order to be ethical, ebay
needs to restructure how they do things.  Meaning, they should hide the
current price and just let everyone bid their maximum.  At the end of
the auction, show who won.
 
 Here's an excellent guide to sniping:
 http://members.home.net/cruenti/ebay/snipe.html

An excellent article, thanks!  

My final thoughts:  I think it's only moral and ethical if the current
bid were hidden from everyone before the auction was over, but the
chances of changing ebay is as likely as me winning the lottery.  And
even if I could lobby ebay to change, they never would, since the
underlying psychology of why people snipe ultimately makes ebay more
money :-(

Rest of the list:  No more discussion on this is needed, BTW, I have my
answer.  Thanks to all who responded.
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 In a message dated 08/28/2001 2:37:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  How can you tell they were testing it and not honestly bidding for the
  item? 
 
 Well usually a person has a max around a round figure, say $100 for fun.
 Someone will increase bids below the round figures, say $24.09, 49.09, 74.09,
 99.09 until they catch the max. The 99.09 would drive it to $100 instead of
 $102.xx or whatever so you know you have reached the limit. I saw someone
 drive up an item to the max of $2000 just for fun, they had no intention of
 buying the item.

Ouch.  I think I understand now; they'll bid in $.50 increments until
the system won't let them bid something that won't break past the
minimum-allowable bid?  Geez.

It sounds like everyone *has* to snipe in order for the system to be
fair.  This is really starting to stink :)
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




RE: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Hugh Falk

I am a confirmed sniper... C.E. and I have out sniped one another on a few
occasions.  We've talked afterwards, and while there is usually
disappointment, there is never hard feelings because that's the way it has
to be done if you're a serious collector on eBay.

The main reason I snipe is that you can absolutely get items for less money
if you snipe.  I 100% guarantee it.  The reason is that the theory of proxy
bidding is not the reality.  Most people do not really bid their maximum on
first bid.  I learned this early on when I first started on eBay.  Let's say
you bid $50 for a game one week before the auction ends.  Then, one day
before the auction ends, somebody bids $51.  You think, well what does $2
matter?  So you bid again.  Then the other person does the same.  I have
seen this time and time again on eBay.

This is an old trick of auctions.  Proxy bidding is not a service for the
buyer (unless you have unlimited funds and very limited time).  It is a
service to the seller and to the auction house.  That is how they drive the
price up beyond what you would normally pay for an item.  Their goal is to
get you in a bidding war...ideally to where it becomes a matter of
principle, and you will have the item at any cost.  Most people don't get
into this mentality, but all it takes is two people to drive the price up
and get more money for the seller and therefore the auction house as well.

If you are a buyer, it is in your best interest to snipe.  It is the
greatest buyer advantage eBay has over a traditional auction...a set time
limit.  There is no auctioneer who will keep the auction going until he is
sure all people are done bidding.  It requires more effort on the part of a
sniper (you can't just bid and walk away), but you will get the item for
less, and you are assured of either getting the item or at the very least
only having to bid your true maximum.

Hugh

-Original Message-
From: Jim Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Sniping


Stephen S. Lee wrote:

 On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
 [snip]
  1. Why do you snipe when you can just enter in a maximum and walk away?

 * If you bid early, and you bid primarily on game software, bidding early
   says loud and clear, look!  cool stuff!  (I actually find some of the
   stuff I get by searching for certain early-bidders.  It's actually a
   good way of finding things.)

Why is this an issue?  Is it because you draw attention to yourself?
If so, why is that a bad thing?

 * If you have only so much money to spend, and want multiple items, you're
   better off waiting as long as you can.  For example, you have $100 to
   spend; there are 10 games that you want; on each, you're willing to pay
   as much as $20.  You can't bid $20 on all of them right away, as you
   could be driven above your limit.  It's better to wait on these as long
   as you can, and see how the first auctions go before you decide what to
   do with the later ones.

But that isn't sniping -- that's just waiting a while before bidding
your maximum.  I'm talking about intentionally waiting until seconds
before the auction.

 * Bidding early has a tendency to get you into a bidding war with newbies
   (who have a tendency to pay too much).  If you don't tip your hand you
   minimize this risk from those people with low ratings who are willing to
   pay WAY over value.

In my experience, these people rarely pay up and, being the second
bidder, I get the item anyway.  And using proxy bidding the way it was
meant to work means that you *don't* get into bidding wars.

 * Bidding early puts you at risk of ye olde bid-and-retract trick.
   eBay has moved to reduce the viability of this trick, but it's still
   something to keep in mind.

Huh?  What's that?  I'm unfamiliar with that practice...?

BTW, thanks for the detailed responses.  I still haven't been given an
acceptable proof for the legitimacy of sniping, but I appreciate the
willingness to help me understand why people do it.

I'll reiterate that sniping doesn't really bother me from the *auction*
standpoint -- when I bid my maximum, most of the time I see people
bidding at the last few seconds and losing because the proxy bids me
closer to my maximum by a buck or two.  What bothers me is *why* people
do it.  I guess I'd need a degree in psychology to try to understand...
--
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the 

Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Stephen S. Lee


On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
 Stephen S. Lee wrote:
 
  On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
  [snip]
   1. Why do you snipe when you can just enter in a maximum and walk away?
 
  * If you bid early, and you bid primarily on game software, bidding early
says loud and clear, look!  cool stuff!  (I actually find some of the
stuff I get by searching for certain early-bidders.  It's actually a
good way of finding things.)

 Why is this an issue?  Is it because you draw attention to yourself?
 If so, why is that a bad thing?

If you draw attention to yourself, that increases competition, meaning
you'll have to pay more on average.  You know, increased demand and all
that.  Actually, lately it looks like you're a good target for this, so
maybe I'll intrude on your auctions (just because what you bid on tends to
be cool stuff, and it's easier to search for your bids than to search for
300 things I want individually).

There's a specific example given somewhere at YOIS (the photograph of
Meretzky  Adams).

  * If you have only so much money to spend, and want multiple items, you're
better off waiting as long as you can.  For example, you have $100 to
spend; there are 10 games that you want; on each, you're willing to pay
as much as $20.  You can't bid $20 on all of them right away, as you
could be driven above your limit.  It's better to wait on these as long
as you can, and see how the first auctions go before you decide what to
do with the later ones.

 But that isn't sniping -- that's just waiting a while before bidding
 your maximum.  I'm talking about intentionally waiting until seconds
 before the auction.

Right, but (at least when I have money to spend, which I don't until my
next paycheck rolls in) often this means waiting until the last hour or
so, given how close many auctions end.  Often, if the auctions are by the
same person, and you're interested in several of them (which happens
often), the auctions end only a couple minutes apart, and you *do* have to
snipe in order to do this.

  * Bidding early has a tendency to get you into a bidding war with newbies
(who have a tendency to pay too much).  If you don't tip your hand you
minimize this risk from those people with low ratings who are willing to
pay WAY over value.

 In my experience, these people rarely pay up and, being the second
 bidder, I get the item anyway.  And using proxy bidding the way it was
 meant to work means that you *don't* get into bidding wars.

Huh?  Proxy bidding makes automatic bids.  If you place an early high bid,
and a newbie wants a particular item badly, a newbie who has no sense of
value will often keep placing successive bids until he's got your proxy
bid of $60 beat.  If you wait (and newbies often don't know about
sniping), you can easily overtake his tentative bid of $10.  You can save
a LOT of money this way, because you are not tipping your hand that you
value a particular item highly.

Also, in my experience I rarely get these items.  Getting the item as
the second-highest bidder has happens to me twice in about a hundred or so
lost auctions (if I lose an auction I'm bidding on seriously, I'm almost
always second).

  * Bidding early puts you at risk of ye olde bid-and-retract trick.
eBay has moved to reduce the viability of this trick, but it's still
something to keep in mind.

 Huh?  What's that?  I'm unfamiliar with that practice...?

Place a high bid, and retract it, so you know what the other's bid is
exactly.  (This isn't legal on eBay, but it still happens.)

Also, bidding early leaves you open to people who drive up your bid just
because they can.

-- Stephen


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Best voice acting in a game

2001-08-28 Thread C.E. Forman

Really?  I would never have guessed!  Amazing what those early programmers
could accomplish.  Thanks for the info.

- Original Message -
From: Jim Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Best voice acting in a game


 C.E. Forman wrote:
 
  My all-time personal favorite?  This is gonna sound strange, but...
Whoever
  did the voice clip of Professor Elvin Atombender at the start of Epyx's
  Impossible Mission for the C64: Stay awhile... Staaayyy FOREVE!
  Freaking awesome, even today.

 You'll kick yourself:  That's 100% speech synthesis.  You should give
 homage to the programmer that tweaked the phonemes and inflection.
 --
 http://www.MobyGames.com/
 The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.



 --
 This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
 the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
 Archives are available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread C.E. Forman

Jim, I know you said you had all the info you wanted on sniping, but I'll
share my experience anyway if anyone cares to listen.

When I first arrived on eBay, I was a total newbie.  Saw something I liked,
stuck a bid on it.  Not necessarily the max I'd go, I was still feeling out
the system.  But, long story short, a bunch of people saw me and immediately
started searching on my ID.  He's found some good stuff, let's watch what
he's bidding on so we'll know about it too.  Nothing wrong with doing that.
I search on other people's IDs all the time.  Because you can.

I learned fast.  Proxy bidding is great, but it leaves you vulnerable to
someone who's easily willing to outbid your maximum.  The Meretzky/Adams
photo Stephen refers to was my second win on eBay, and I ended up paying
about $48 for it because another collector found it by scoping my activity.
(That was high at the time, but I would've easily bid that amount now.)  The
solution I came up with was, wait to bid until it's closer to the time the
auction closes, so there's less chance of someone seeing your bid attached
to an item.  The snipe is the ultimate example of this tactic.  It works
great for poorly listed items (Suspected Face-Mask Game by Info-Com) that
other bidders might not see... unless another known collector draws their
attention to it.

Fact: I've personally won more rare/valuable items using sniping than I have
without.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Stephen S. Lee


On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
[snip]
 Maybe this leads into another question:  I would like to watch several
 auctions to see what happens to them, but doing so manually is a chore.
 Is there a (free) service or piece of software that will let me set up
 auctions to watch?

What's wrong with the service eBay provides?  You're limited to watching
20 items, but in my experience this is adequate.

-- Stephen


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

C.E. Forman wrote:
 
 to an item.  The snipe is the ultimate example of this tactic.  It works
 great for poorly listed items (Suspected Face-Mask Game by Info-Com) that

Hey, just how *do* you find poorly-listed items?  I've found stuff
purely by accident that was mis-named just as badly as the above AND was
totally mis-categorized (it was under Magazines -- I'm not kidding).  I
found it almost completely randomly, but do you guys actually search for
these things?  I imagine you would, because it's almost guaranteed you'd
get something decent for 4 bucks.  How do you actually find stuff so
poorly categorized and named?
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Leonard

Stephen S. Lee wrote:
 
 On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
 [snip]
  Maybe this leads into another question:  I would like to watch several
  auctions to see what happens to them, but doing so manually is a chore.
  Is there a (free) service or piece of software that will let me set up
  auctions to watch?
 
 What's wrong with the service eBay provides?  You're limited to watching
 20 items, but in my experience this is adequate.

Didn't know about it.  :-)

Can you use it to watch people as well?  I had no idea people watched
other people... I had no idea some of you were watching *me* (shudder)
-- 
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive gaming database project.

--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread C.E. Forman

 Hey, just how *do* you find poorly-listed items?  I've found stuff
 purely by accident that was mis-named just as badly as the above AND was
 totally mis-categorized (it was under Magazines -- I'm not kidding).  I
 found it almost completely randomly, but do you guys actually search for
 these things?  I imagine you would, because it's almost guaranteed you'd
 get something decent for 4 bucks.  How do you actually find stuff so
 poorly categorized and named?

Lots of ways:

1.)  Obscure search terms, such as old computer game, flying saucer
package, etc.  Things the people who search on Infocom or Starcross
will miss if it's improperly listed.

2.)  Misspellings.  Yes, search on people's typos.  I've found items using
Invisi-Clues and Kings Quest more often than you'd think.

3.)  Browsing categories.  It takes time, but it's worth it.  My faves are
the ones for Apple II / Vintage Mac, Atari Games, Commodore, and the
all-encompassing vintage games.

4.)  eBay provides a feature allowing you to save up to 15 searches.  Use
it, and use it well.  For instance, searching on
(infocom,zork,ultima,akalabeth,serenia,cranston,softporn,drash) will turn
up the best collectible games in one decisive blow, and you still get 14
more searches after that.



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Stephen S. Lee


On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
 Stephen S. Lee wrote:
  On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jim Leonard wrote:
  [snip]
   Maybe this leads into another question:  I would like to watch several
   auctions to see what happens to them, but doing so manually is a chore.
   Is there a (free) service or piece of software that will let me set up
   auctions to watch?
 
  What's wrong with the service eBay provides?  You're limited to watching
  20 items, but in my experience this is adequate.

 Didn't know about it.  :-)

It is one of eBay's most handy little tools.  Exploit it :)

 Can you use it to watch people as well?  I had no idea people watched
 other people... I had no idea some of you were watching *me* (shudder)

You can't watch other people like this (you *can* watch sellers like this,
but not bidders), and you can't watch bidders at all if they're from
certain countries.  Watching bidders is done by manually using eBay's
search by bidder function every time you feel like watching what others
are doing.

The ways to avoid this are to (1) move to one of said certain countries
(like Germany), or (2) snipe, or at least refrain from bidding until the
final few hours the auction is open.

-- Stephen


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Chris Newman

Speaking of sniping...

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1266370886

ha ha ha

C.E. Forman wrote:

  Hey, just how *do* you find poorly-listed items?  I've found stuff
  purely by accident that was mis-named just as badly as the above AND was
  totally mis-categorized (it was under Magazines -- I'm not kidding).  I
  found it almost completely randomly, but do you guys actually search for
  these things?  I imagine you would, because it's almost guaranteed you'd
  get something decent for 4 bucks.  How do you actually find stuff so
  poorly categorized and named?

 Lots of ways:

 1.)  Obscure search terms, such as old computer game, flying saucer
 package, etc.  Things the people who search on Infocom or Starcross
 will miss if it's improperly listed.

 2.)  Misspellings.  Yes, search on people's typos.  I've found items using
 Invisi-Clues and Kings Quest more often than you'd think.

 3.)  Browsing categories.  It takes time, but it's worth it.  My faves are
 the ones for Apple II / Vintage Mac, Atari Games, Commodore, and the
 all-encompassing vintage games.

 4.)  eBay provides a feature allowing you to save up to 15 searches.  Use
 it, and use it well.  For instance, searching on
 (infocom,zork,ultima,akalabeth,serenia,cranston,softporn,drash) will turn
 up the best collectible games in one decisive blow, and you still get 14
 more searches after that.

 --
 This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
 the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
 Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Chris Newman

Speaking of sniping...

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1266370886

ha ha ha

C.E. Forman wrote:

  Hey, just how *do* you find poorly-listed items?  I've found stuff
  purely by accident that was mis-named just as badly as the above AND was
  totally mis-categorized (it was under Magazines -- I'm not kidding).  I
  found it almost completely randomly, but do you guys actually search for
  these things?  I imagine you would, because it's almost guaranteed you'd
  get something decent for 4 bucks.  How do you actually find stuff so
  poorly categorized and named?

 Lots of ways:

 1.)  Obscure search terms, such as old computer game, flying saucer
 package, etc.  Things the people who search on Infocom or Starcross
 will miss if it's improperly listed.

 2.)  Misspellings.  Yes, search on people's typos.  I've found items using
 Invisi-Clues and Kings Quest more often than you'd think.

 3.)  Browsing categories.  It takes time, but it's worth it.  My faves are
 the ones for Apple II / Vintage Mac, Atari Games, Commodore, and the
 all-encompassing vintage games.

 4.)  eBay provides a feature allowing you to save up to 15 searches.  Use
 it, and use it well.  For instance, searching on
 (infocom,zork,ultima,akalabeth,serenia,cranston,softporn,drash) will turn
 up the best collectible games in one decisive blow, and you still get 14
 more searches after that.

 --
 This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
 the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
 Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Chris Newman

Speaking of sniping...

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1266370886

ha ha ha

C.E. Forman wrote:

  Hey, just how *do* you find poorly-listed items?  I've found stuff
  purely by accident that was mis-named just as badly as the above AND was
  totally mis-categorized (it was under Magazines -- I'm not kidding).  I
  found it almost completely randomly, but do you guys actually search for
  these things?  I imagine you would, because it's almost guaranteed you'd
  get something decent for 4 bucks.  How do you actually find stuff so
  poorly categorized and named?

 Lots of ways:

 1.)  Obscure search terms, such as old computer game, flying saucer
 package, etc.  Things the people who search on Infocom or Starcross
 will miss if it's improperly listed.

 2.)  Misspellings.  Yes, search on people's typos.  I've found items using
 Invisi-Clues and Kings Quest more often than you'd think.

 3.)  Browsing categories.  It takes time, but it's worth it.  My faves are
 the ones for Apple II / Vintage Mac, Atari Games, Commodore, and the
 all-encompassing vintage games.

 4.)  eBay provides a feature allowing you to save up to 15 searches.  Use
 it, and use it well.  For instance, searching on
 (infocom,zork,ultima,akalabeth,serenia,cranston,softporn,drash) will turn
 up the best collectible games in one decisive blow, and you still get 14
 more searches after that.

 --
 This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
 the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
 Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Dan Chisarick

46 new messages, 44 from this list, its unlikely I'll contribute any new
insight.  But for the record, I'll snip anything except when the auction
ends when I can't be in front of my PC.  Anyway:

- I use the watch list so people don't search for my bids
- I also use the watch list to cut back on bidding on everything.  Gives me
time to think if I really want it.  Also allows me to prioritize.
- Cutting back on cost is good.  When I started snipping, I did so at the 30
second marker.  I've had people bid again within that window (+$50!)  If I
was more daring, I'd have saved the cash.

And one absolutely dirty trick (in theory of course)... if someone is
constantly warring with you (usually for multiple items from the same
seller) you can get a feel for their limits, look at their bidding list, and
crank up the bids on things you don't want that they're bidding on.  They'll
(hopefully) deplete their cash and not fight so hard for the items you
really want.  The risk is obvious, though.  Did someone already say this?

Not sniping has an advantage though.  Intimidation.  If someone is good
and does a little research and sees that their opponent has deep pockets,
they may reconsider bidding at all.  This doesn't always work, but sometimes
if I really could go either way on something, I'll stay away from vetran
bidders.  Or deep-pocketed newbies.  I recently passed on a IIgs game that I
saw was pursued by a list member.  I passed solely on the premise of the
bidder and it being a would be nice instead of a must have.  The money I
save usually scores me a half-dozen or so would be nice titles that go
with one bid (mine).

Dan


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Sniping

2001-08-28 Thread Dan Chisarick

46 new messages, 44 from this list, its unlikely I'll contribute any new
insight.  But for the record, I'll snip anything except when the auction
ends when I can't be in front of my PC.  Anyway:

- I use the watch list so people don't search for my bids
- I also use the watch list to cut back on bidding on everything.  Gives me
time to think if I really want it.  Also allows me to prioritize.
- Cutting back on cost is good.  When I started snipping, I did so at the 30
second marker.  I've had people bid again within that window (+$50!)  If I
was more daring, I'd have saved the cash.

And one absolutely dirty trick (in theory of course)... if someone is
constantly warring with you (usually for multiple items from the same
seller) you can get a feel for their limits, look at their bidding list, and
crank up the bids on things you don't want that they're bidding on.  They'll
(hopefully) deplete their cash and not fight so hard for the items you
really want.  The risk is obvious, though.  Did someone already say this?

Not sniping has an advantage though.  Intimidation.  If someone is good
and does a little research and sees that their opponent has deep pockets,
they may reconsider bidding at all.  This doesn't always work, but sometimes
if I really could go either way on something, I'll stay away from vetran
bidders.  Or deep-pocketed newbies.  I recently passed on a IIgs game that I
saw was pursued by a list member.  I passed solely on the premise of the
bidder and it being a would be nice instead of a must have.  The money I
save usually scores me a half-dozen or so would be nice titles that go
with one bid (mine).

Dan



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




[SWCollect] Shrinkwrap again

2001-08-28 Thread Dan Chisarick

Read the bottom of this description (about the shrinkwrap).  Sound
reshrunk?

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1266478226r=0t=0sh
owTutorial=0ed=999065385indexURL=0rd=1


--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/




Re: [SWCollect] Shrinkwrap again

2001-08-28 Thread Chris Newman


Well, I bought it over a year ago from a large-scale software distributor
who went out of business, not a mom-and-pop used game outlet. The wrap
isn't the brittle kind, but on the other hand, the holes and seams look
a little crude. I know the game is new, regardless. The dealer assured
me as much, and I've dealt with him enough to trust him.
Chris
Dan Chisarick wrote:
 Read the bottom of this description
(about the shrinkwrap). Sound
reshrunk?
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1266478226r=0t=0sh
owTutorial=0ed=999065385indexURL=0rd=1
--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/



--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/