Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-09-12 Thread Jim Leonard
"Lee K. Seitz" wrote: Jim Leonard boldly stated: :) I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so overused/misused. Let's take a vote: Who here would like to see "Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"? A yay or nay from everyone will be enough. Yay.

Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-30 Thread Chris Newman
Yea -- a sealed item can be both mint or utterly destroyed. "Mint sealed" adds a level of refinement to the grade. Chris Jim Leonard wrote: "C.E. Forman" wrote: Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been thinking about formalizing my personal scale for

Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-30 Thread C.E. Forman
I second Hugh's opinion. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 10:22 PM Subject: RE: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2) Yay. Mint Sealed should be as close to perfect as possible. Anything less (crushing

Re: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)

2000-08-30 Thread Lee K. Seitz
Jim Leonard boldly stated: :) I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so overused/misused. Let's take a vote: Who here would like to see "Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"? A yay or nay from everyone will be enough. Yay. -- Lee K. Seitz * [EMAIL