Adam Baratz stated:
>
>It might've started with the 2600. Activision started because developers at
>Atari wanted more control and recognition for their work. Atari's games
>didn't list developer/designer names anywhere on the physical product.
>Before Activision, all 2600 games were released by A
Adam Baratz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Publishers vs. Developers
It might've started with the 2600. Activision started because
developers at
Atari wanted more control and recognition for their work. Atari'
ion.
Apple and Commodore may have done some "publishing" as early as 77, but
I don't know of any definite examples.
Hugh
-Original Message-
From: Adam Baratz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SWCollect] Publishe
It might've started with the 2600. Activision started because developers at
Atari wanted more control and recognition for their work. Atari's games
didn't list developer/designer names anywhere on the physical product.
Before Activision, all 2600 games were released by Atari.
NES games had third
