"Lee K. Seitz" wrote:
>
> Jim Leonard boldly stated:
> >
> >:) I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
> >overused/misused. Let's take a vote: Who here would like to see
> >"Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"? A yay or nay from
> >everyone will be enou
Jim Leonard boldly stated:
>
>:) I'm trying to stay away from the term "Mint" since it's so
>overused/misused. Let's take a vote: Who here would like to see
>"Factory-Sealed" on the scale be renamed to "Mint Sealed"? A yay or nay from
>everyone will be enough.
Yay.
--
Lee K. Seitz * [EMAI
I second Hugh's opinion.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)
> Yay.
>
> Mint Sealed should be as close to perfect a
Yea -- a sealed item can be both mint or utterly destroyed. "Mint sealed" adds a
level of refinement to the grade.
Chris
Jim Leonard wrote:
> "C.E. Forman" wrote:
> >
> > > Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been
> > > thinking about formalizing my personal scale
: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 11:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Vote (Was: Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale, version 0.2)
"C.E. Forman" wrote:
>
> > Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been
> > thinking about formalizing my personal s
"C.E. Forman" wrote:
>
> > Now that I think about it, if I were doing such a scale (and I've been
> > thinking about formalizing my personal scale for video game cartridges
> > for a long time), I would not make "factory sealed" a condition, but
> > rather something that should be noted separatel
